As a data consumer I discard area for labeling if it contains node with the
same place= and name= keys. This is not 100% safe but removes major label
duplications from my map.
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:45 PM Daniel Koć wrote:
> Sorry for cross-posting on 3 lists, but this
I am creating small map extracts with the help of osmconvert (v 0.8.7) and
have noticed that some(!) large area relations are broken (incomplete) in
data outputs despite I use '--complex-ways' argument. Here is the example:
Test relation is: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6193646
If I
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:56:26AM +0300, Ilya Zverev wrote:
> I have downloaded a planet file around... March?.. and have been updating it
> using osmupdate 0.3H every two weeks or so. And now I've met a curious bug.
> Look at these way nodes:
>
> $ ./osmconvert planet-171009.o5m --out-osm |
Hi,
I have downloaded a planet file around... March?.. and have been updating it
using osmupdate 0.3H every two weeks or so. And now I've met a curious bug.
Look at these way nodes:
$ ./osmconvert planet-171009.o5m --out-osm | grep -A 3 '
4 matches
Mail list logo