I'm sort of resurrecting an old thread I started last year. I find
Martijn's Overpass Python library to be very useful for small queries but I
frequently run into usage limits. I'd like to query an XML download
directly to save bandwidth and reduce consumption of Overpass resources,
but I can't
On 06/08/2019 16:32, marc marc wrote:
josm allow to download data from overpass,
which allows a larger limit.
Overpass's greater capacity is one reason why I was querying OSM.org's
limitations.
Using OP to send data to JOSM for mass editing is one of the occasions I
do use it to edit.
Le 06.08.19 à 17:11, Dave F via dev a écrit :
>> - all that export does is redirect
>> to the same API that JOSM etc use.
> Yes, I've noticed the limitations of JOSM
josm allow to download data from overpass,
which allows a larger limit.
osm-fr had also an api proxy that redirect
some request to
On 06/08/2019 15:06, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 06/08/2019 14:45, Dave F via dev wrote:
Why are you mentioning 'rendering'?
Because I thought we were talking about map exports?
I am.
"Main Page > Export" makes *no* mention of rendering.
I assume you meant the raw data export? That is the
On 06/08/2019 14:45, Dave F via dev wrote:
Why are you mentioning 'rendering'?
Because I thought we were talking about map exports?
I assume you meant the raw data export? That is the
standard API limit - all that export does is redirect
to the same API that JOSM etc use.
That really isn't
On 06/08/2019 14:24, Dave F via dev wrote:
Is this based on server & connection speeds etc? If so has it been
reviewed recently? With the increase in general computing power is there
a reason this limit could not be increased?
Rendering custom maps is very expensive and is not really
a core
Hi
Main Page > Export*. I'm often getting the following message:
"You requested too many nodes (limit is 5). Either request a smaller
area, or use planet.osm"
To get within this limit the downloadable area has been greatly reduced
as more data is added to OSM, especially in urban areas.
On 06/08/2019 13:47, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 06/08/2019 13:29, Dave F via dev wrote:
On 06/08/2019 12:26, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 06/08/2019 12:04, Dave F via dev wrote:
A user has asked why the image creation tool under 'Share' couldn't
automatically add an attribution. It would certainly
On 06/08/2019 13:29, Dave F via dev wrote:
On 06/08/2019 12:26, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 06/08/2019 12:04, Dave F via dev wrote:
A user has asked why the image creation tool under 'Share' couldn't
automatically add an attribution. It would certainly save me a lot of
email sending asking users
On 06/08/2019 12:04, Dave F via dev wrote:
A user has asked why the image creation tool under 'Share' couldn't
automatically add an attribution. It would certainly save me a lot of
email sending asking users to add it.
If you mean the option that gives you an image based on the
default
Hi
A user has asked why the image creation tool under 'Share' couldn't
automatically add an attribution. It would certainly save me a lot of
email sending asking users to add it.
Would it be much coding effort?
Cheers
DaveF
___
dev mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo
