Re: [OSM-dev] Coastline as part of other object types?

Mar 31, 2019, 5:40 PM by sandor...@gmail.com: > > >>  > > > >>Can you link some objects that you consider as tagged in a wrong way and > > > >>some similar ones tagged in way that you consider correct? > > > >>Currently it is unclear to me what is the problem. > > > >>  > > > These notes have

Re: [OSM-dev] Coastline as part of other object types?

Mar 23, 2019, 7:31 AM by sandor...@gmail.com: > > So, we get coastline objects in none coastline objects. It is worth noting > that even if in some maps these compensations look correct, essentially it is > still wrong. A standalone coastline object tagged as place=island is never > part of

Re: [OSM-dev] Coastline as part of other object types?

Hi Sandor, for me the typical reason to use a coastline way in a multipolygon is this: An island in the ocean with natural=bare_rock. The outline of the island is described with the natural=coastline way and the multipolygon uses the same way with role=outer. The monster mp is probably wrong,

[OSM-dev] Coastline as part of other object types?

About two weeks ago I asked a similar question on the Help Forum without getting any help. More precisely, my question was this https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/68275/coastline-as-part-of-a-multipolygon . Of course, the notes related to the example/illustration are fully correct but