On 28 March 2010 19:09, Jaak Laineste j...@nutiteq.com wrote:
sample has total 52 fields: name and HTML descriptions in 3 languages,
photos, opening hours, contacts (email,web,post, phones), organization
details, tickets,access (wheelchair, public transport details), different
flags etc.
Hi,
Im just tagging on to this thread for the archives. As it was just sent to
the imports@ list, but not dev@ list,
It attempts to solve the ideas that jaak noted below.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2010-March/005544.html
(I was going to respond last week on this thread) ...
Hi,
Jaak Laineste wrote:
There could be quite good reasons to protect some of the data at least
temporarily.
Let's look at them then.
Very technical reason: to avoid accidental deletion of nodes
during bulk import (which takes days sometimes).
Happened to me - but to be honest, only
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Jaak Laineste wrote:
Is there a way to make maintenance
of only their specific data in OSM easy?
I think we're having different pictures here. OSM is not a platform
which you can use to host your data. The data ceases
At 2010-03-22 12:02, Nic Roets wrote:
...
Unfortunately it has already happened many times. Below is a list of
the third party identifiers that I have found.
...
hdop
sat
pdop
fix
vdop
To pick a nit, these are likely not ids, but instead useful info provided
via GPS. I recognize:
hdop =
Hi,
Jaak Laineste wrote:
Just for the
future APIs I suggest to give to original importer (or just editor) some
kind of priority over the others. Like possibility to lock/protect some
parts of the data. It could be done in several levels:
1) my inserted data (tag, node, relation, way - any
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Jaak Laineste wrote:
1) my inserted data (tag, node, relation, way - any of them) can be
defined
as private, nobody else can not even see it.
2) my data is protected - you can see, but not modify
3) my data has
I've long considered that it would be good to have a system whereby anyone
modifying a specified subset of the database would be presented with a
message for them to read before comitting.
This would be implemented with a special key that all editing software would
be encouraged to support.
In
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 22/03/10 15:00, Nic Roets wrote:
One solution is to add your own tag to the OSM files you generate e.g.
smartsoft_id=nnn. And publish the files for
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Almost 100% of the time these are imported to allow for the possibility of
future updates to the existing imports.
Except, as you point out, they can't be used in any way for future
updates since you've got no idea if the
On 22 March 2010 12:38, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Almost 100% of the time these are imported to allow for the possibility
of
future updates to the existing imports.
Except, as you point out, they can't be
11 matches
Mail list logo
