Hi Harald,
the one you pointed out seem pretty much to be errors.
Please see this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.872858lon=11.031874zoom=18layers=B000FTF
Hi Alessandro!
You're right, this shouldn't be an error. But in my copy of the database
(2009-01-02) SS12 and Corso Verona are not yet connected. So the error
is not related to roundabouts, Corso Verona just looked like an open end.
Best regards,
HArald
Hi Harald,
the one you pointed out
Hi, Alessandro!
I'm not sure if I fully understand your post.
I do think that a roundabout should be a circular way where the first
node is connected to the last one. There need not necessarily be another
road connected to the first node of such a loop.
Please give me an example so I can
Hi Marc!
well I think I did some overkill...
If this is common conensus I will drop this check, because it is
superseded by check intersections without junctions, which does
exactly what you describe.
Thank you!
Best Regards
Harald
There are several marks saying This way is tagged as
Hi,
this tool is very helpful.
I found a potential false positive which is related to roundabouts.
A roundabout which has node 1 not connected to any way. It's considered
as a oneway (which is correct) but it does not matter if it's start and
end nodes are not connected, imho.
Alessandro
Hi!
During the last months I worked a lot on my check routines and created a
website that presents spots in the map that could contain errors.
Please have a look at
http://keepright.ipax.at
I will try to update the error table on a regular schedule and at some
time in
Hi,
Marc Schütz wrote:
You probably mean the section in [[Key:layer]], right? Note that this has
only been added three weeks ago. The page [[Layer]] on the contrary states:
A road on a bridge or viaduct will be on layer 1 _most of the time_.
This was never meant to say you can omit the
Hi!
Thank you for this tool and for the recent update.
I had a look in my area and saw two errors of the railway crossings
without tag kind.
But these nodes were indeed tagged with railway=crossing which is
documented in the wiki as A point where pedestrians may cross.
Could you adopt this check
Hi!
=20
During the last months I worked a lot on my check routines and created =
a=20
website that presents spots in the map that could contain errors.
=20
Please have a look at
=20
http://keepright.ipax.at
=20
I will try to update the error table on a regular schedule and at some =
time
Hi!
During the last months I worked a lot on my check routines and created a
website that presents spots in the map that could contain errors.
Please have a look at
http://keepright.ipax.at
I will try to update the error table on a regular schedule and at some
time in the future run the
finally i get some competition :-)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WayCheck
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MotorwayCheck
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SomeChecks
cheers
gary68
Am Sonntag, den 14.12.2008, 18:54 +0100 schrieb Harald Kleiner:
Hi!
During the last months I
Am 14.12.2008 18:54, Harald Kleiner:
Hi!
During the last months I worked a lot on my check routines and created a
website that presents spots in the map that could contain errors.
Please have a look at
http://keepright.ipax.at
I will try to update the error table on a regular schedule
Hi,
Here's some things I've spotted:
You can have a railway=crossing for a crossing where pedestrians can
cross, but motor vehicles can't.
There is no permalink facility on the slippy map.
Ways without nodes will be deletable directly through the API, you
will not be able to download them
THIS. TOOL. IS. GREAT! Thank you!
I will try to update the error table on a regular schedule and at som=
e
time in the future run the checks on the whole planet file, not just
Europe. At the moment time and disk space restrictions prevent that..=
=2E
I have seen that the checker finds
Hi David,
[sorry for the delay!]
At the moment the minimum allowed distance from a dead end to any segment is
10 Meters. I chose this value as it is approximately the width of a road.
Most of the errors I want to find are such that the end of a road comes that
near to another segment that
Hi David,
[sorry for the delay!]
At the moment the minimum allowed distance from a dead end to any segment is
10 Meters. I chose this value as it is approximately the width of a road.
Most of the errors I want to find are such that the end of a road comes that
near to another segment that
On Sunday, 8 June 2008 19:59:43 +0100,
Etric Celine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 07 June 2008 20:47:32 Harald Kleiner wrote:
Is there anyone (still) interested in such a framework (need more details)?
I'm sure many people appreciate your framework.
Especially the
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:47:32PM +0200, Harald Kleiner wrote:
According to the task Data Consistency Checks on Things_To_Do-page I set up a
framework that implements checking for errors and allows to give every issue
some state information to see if errors are getting corrected. (In fact
On Saturday 07 June 2008 20:47:32 Harald Kleiner wrote:
Is there anyone (still) interested in such a framework (need more details)?
I'm sure many people appreciate your framework.
Especially the almost-junction between roads check is pure gold to me.
If there would be any possibility to combine
Hi!
According to the task Data Consistency Checks on Things_To_Do-page I set up a
framework that implements checking for errors and allows to give every issue
some state information to see if errors are getting corrected. (In fact errors
are stored in a table.)
What you get is a splitted
20 matches
Mail list logo
