Hi,
Andy Allan wrote:
Nice. Much of this I suspect is because people really, really don't
understand the spatial bit of spatial databases.
Many also don't understand the databases bit of spatial databases ;-)
To be fair, we don't exactly exhibit a lot of database power through our
API (for
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Increasingly, and I believe this is born from unreflected Wikipedia customs
being applied here, people make collections or categories using
relations, for example cycle network North-Rine-Westphalia containing
every cycle
On Tue, November 4, 2008 12:10, Andy Allan wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Increasingly, and I believe this is born from unreflected Wikipedia
customs being applied here, people make collections or categories
using relations, for example cycle
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 09:50 +, Andy Allan wrote:
Should we restrict the maximum number of relations|ways|nodes that can
be *direct* members of a relation? I don't mind cascading relations,
but 39000 direct members of a single relation might casue issues too.
Just as a heads-up to anyone
Jochen Topf wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 08:40:45PM +1100, Brett Henderson wrote:
Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:17:16AM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Hi,
i just discovered that osmosis was not able to apply the hourly osc file
starting
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Shaun McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2 Nov 2008, at 10:58, Jochen Topf wrote:
[..]
I think you'll have to do that until the server is changed to forbid
more than x nodes on ways.
Is there a problem with changing the server code to count the nodes and
Hi,
Andy Allan wrote:
Should we restrict the maximum number of relations|ways|nodes that can
be *direct* members of a relation? I don't mind cascading relations,
but 39000 direct members of a single relation might casue issues too.
I tend to say yes, limit it in some way.
People are starting
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 08:40:45PM +1100, Brett Henderson wrote:
Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:17:16AM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Hi,
i just discovered that osmosis was not able to apply the hourly osc file
starting 2008-10-29T20:00:00Z - It failed with:
Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:17:16AM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Hi,
i just discovered that osmosis was not able to apply the hourly osc file
starting 2008-10-29T20:00:00Z - It failed with:
2008-10-31 11:09:52 CET ERROR: smallint out of range
2008-10-31 11:09:52
On 2 Nov 2008, at 10:58, Jochen Topf wrote:
[..]
I think you'll have to do that until the server is changed to forbid
more than x nodes on ways.
Is there a problem with changing the server code to count the nodes
and
return an error if there are more than x nodes? I haven't looked at
the
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:17:16AM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Hi,
i just discovered that osmosis was not able to apply the hourly osc file
starting 2008-10-29T20:00:00Z - It failed with:
2008-10-31 11:09:52 CET ERROR: smallint out of range
2008-10-31 11:09:52 CET STATEMENT: INSERT INTO
11 matches
Mail list logo
