On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 05:21:40PM -0500, Scott Crosby wrote:
On May 8, 2011 5:21 AM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
So I propose the following:
1. Add the visible flag as I have already proposed:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 05:21:40PM -0500, Scott Crosby wrote:
On May 8, 2011 5:21 AM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Thinking about the inclusing of the invisible-Flag I think we have to step
back a bit:
There are two use-cases: One is reading an OSM file with no history
Thinking about the inclusing of the invisible-Flag I think we have to step
back a bit:
There are two use-cases: One is reading an OSM file with no history
information. Thats what most people do. The other is reading an OSM file with
full (or in the future maybe partial) history information. Those
Am Sonntag, den 08.05.2011, 11:50 +0200 schrieb Jochen Topf:
The PBF documentation would then explain that your are not supposed to set the
visible flag on current OSM files and have to ignore its setting when
reading
those, but you have to set and read it for historic OSM files.
An
4 matches
Mail list logo
