Cartinus wrote:
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 15:20:26 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
That's because JOSM has a feature to automatically connect points that
are near each other, but that's as far as it goes since it can't get
any track information from the server.
So while these new ideas give
David Earl wrote:
2009/7/29 Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de:
And no, I don't think the solution is to dropping those traces, but eg
being able to connect traces along a path rather than having a big cloud
of independent points would make them much more useful to me already.
Isn't the
Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
but I agree with Frederik that
the GPS traces as they are now and not overly useful to me, I stopped
downloading existing traces and rely on my local ones instead.
Downloading a point cloud without being able to connect the
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 14:42:05 Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
being able to connect traces along a path rather than having a big cloud
of independent points would make them much more useful to me already.
I don't know what you use to view them, but when I download GPS data with JOSM
then the
2009/7/29 Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de:
And no, I don't think the solution is to dropping those traces, but eg
being able to connect traces along a path rather than having a big cloud
of independent points would make them much more useful to me already.
that's completely true.
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
(b) potlatch? You can't move the aerial-layer (AFAIK)
Yes you can - hold space and drag.
you can't zoom in closely
Yes you can - up to zoom 19. If you need more than that for tracing then you
must have professional survey-grade GPS equipment and be walking very
2009/7/29 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
that's completely true. Another aspect of the problem is
people setting their gps instead of 1p/sec to 1p/10meters or
even more, so that you can't get a clue which points belong
to the same track.
I'm beginning to
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 15:20:26 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
That's because JOSM has a feature to automatically connect points that
are near each other, but that's as far as it goes since it can't get
any track information from the server.
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 15:20:59 Martin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:04 AM, René Affourtitraffour...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry to break the threading
I can break threading too!
So when a junction is reconstructed a local user can place a bounding
box over that junction and all GPS points in that box are marked as
outdated (or deleted,
On 28 Jul 2009, at 16:08, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
To be honest, I think that GPS traces are horribly overrated and
will only further diminish in importance for OSM. I wouldn't spend
a lot of time reinventing anything to do with GPS traces.
Why's that?
For those of
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
To be honest, I think that GPS traces are horribly overrated and
will only further diminish in importance for OSM. I wouldn't spend
a lot of time reinventing anything to do with GPS traces.
Why's that?
For those of you in countries
Hi,
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
well, once you have inserted the streets, you can easily add details
just by knowing the place, add tags and relations to existent
geometry, add footways and other objects by knowing the proportions
and relative position rather than measuring with gps
+
Frederik Ramm wrote:
May be right but using your GPS != uploading a track
Oh yeah, I forget other editors are available. ;)
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Thoughts-on-an-enhanced-GPX-api-tp24696667p24702340.html
Sent from the OpenStreetMap - Dev mailing
13 matches
Mail list logo
