Hi,
hy-soft wrote:
> GPS-tracks usually have a timestamp. So, I thought, when importing data,
> this timestamp is preserved. Every Editor should preserve it and not
> touch it (unless $user chooses to tamper with it).
That's exactly what we do with GPS tracks; if you upload them, the
timestamp i
Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 16/12/09 21:34, hy-soft wrote:
>> Tom Hughes wrote:
>> When I do an upload of a node via the api, every other tag looks fine,
>> but the datetime is set to the time of upload.
>
> Which is exactly what I said, and exactly what it has always done. That
> is what I said earli
Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 16/12/09 17:02, hy-soft wrote:
>> Tom Hughes wrote:
> That's certainly never been the case because no editor has ever provided
> the ability to set a date for an object in that way. The most they could
> ever have done is to set the date it was entered into the editor.
I thi
On 16/12/09 21:34, hy-soft wrote:
> Tom Hughes wrote:
>
>> That's certainly never been the case because no editor has ever provided
>> the ability to set a date for an object in that way. The most they could
>> ever have done is to set the date it was entered into the editor.
>>
>> But, like I say,
Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 16/12/09 16:24, hy-soft wrote:
>
>> For several reasons I am not permanently up to date with osm.
>> Revently I noticed that (obviously due to changes from api) the
>> timestamp is handled differently and set to the upload date-time after
>> creating a node/relation/way.
>
Peter Körner wrote:
> hy-soft schrieb:
>> Revently I noticed that (obviously due to changes from api) the
>> timestamp is handled differently
>
> Which timestams exactly are you talking about. In the changeset? On the
> node? On the Homepage? In the planet.osm? In an api / xapi / trapi
> response?
On 16/12/09 17:02, hy-soft wrote:
> Tom Hughes wrote:
>
>> As opposed to what? A timestamp specified in the uploaded XML file?
>>
>> That has (as far as I know) always been the case - any timestamp in the
>> uploaded XML is discarded. Certainly I believe API's 0.4 to 0.6 have
>> worked in that way
hy-soft schrieb:
> Revently I noticed that (obviously due to changes from api) the
> timestamp is handled differently
Which timestams exactly are you talking about. In the changeset? On the
node? On the Homepage? In the planet.osm? In an api / xapi / trapi response?
Peter
__
On 16/12/09 16:24, hy-soft wrote:
> For several reasons I am not permanently up to date with osm.
> Revently I noticed that (obviously due to changes from api) the
> timestamp is handled differently and set to the upload date-time after
> creating a node/relation/way.
As opposed to what? A timest
Hi,
For several reasons I am not permanently up to date with osm.
Revently I noticed that (obviously due to changes from api) the
timestamp is handled differently and set to the upload date-time after
creating a node/relation/way.
Personnally I think this is strange, but could anyone direct me to t
10 matches
Mail list logo
