Jochen Topf wrote:
I don't like the idea that every web page can now find out whether I run
JOSM and which version it is.
The CORS stuff in the plugin should at least be optional (and the default
should be OFF)!
+1
Please make it configurable via "options" whether informations are sent
to t
John Smith wrote:
On 29 July 2010 18:07, Stephan Knauss wrote:
I did add a version to the interface. That's why it's called "protocol
version".
Wouldn't it be better to just ask about capabilities, then you could
in theory, turn capabilities on or off depending on your circumstance
or preferen
On 29 July 2010 18:07, Stephan Knauss wrote:
> I did add a version to the interface. That's why it's called "protocol
> version".
Wouldn't it be better to just ask about capabilities, then you could
in theory, turn capabilities on or off depending on your circumstance
or preferences, rather than
Jochen Topf wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 01:03:52AM +0200, Stephan Knauss wrote:
I extended JOSM RemoteControl to provide protocol version information.
I don't like the idea that every web page can now find out whether I run
JOSM and which version it is.
Thank you for pointing this out.
A
Am 29.07.2010 01:03, schrieb Stephan Knauss:
Hope somebody considers this useful.
That's pretty cool! Thank you!
Peter
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 01:03:52AM +0200, Stephan Knauss wrote:
> I extended JOSM RemoteControl to provide protocol version information.
> Besides the possibility for clients to choose a compatible command set
> this enables web pages to query for a running JOSM.
>
> Because of restrictions due
Hi,
I extended JOSM RemoteControl to provide protocol version information.
Besides the possibility for clients to choose a compatible command set
this enables web pages to query for a running JOSM.
Because of restrictions due to same origin policy this was not possible
with the existing plug
7 matches
Mail list logo
