Russ Nelson writes:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> > If you're rewriting this perhaps you could also make it support
> > merging two (or more) nodes two the location of a specific node,
> > currently "merge" will merge to the oldest node, which isn't always
> > what you want.
>
> I recall that the resultant node used to have the average location of
> both nodes, but now it seems to use the first node listed in the
> "Current Selection" box.
>
> Seems like if you don't like this behavior,
I found it inconsistent, but what I want (for GNIS cleanup) is to be
able to do something like
select node I want to keep (location wise)
control-select node I want to merge into the previous node
M
(With the GNIS import, there are a lot of existing nodes that are
already in the right place that have been manually edited, and the GNIS
nodes are not placed accurately, but I want the gnis ref tag.)
I don't actually care which node controls the resulting location, but it
seems obvious the first one added to the selection should be it.
pgp9jELk3aoqw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-...@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
