The original message was received at Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:29:31 +0300
from openvswitch.org [219.79.209.164]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
- Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to openvswitch.org.:
554
On 1/14/2016 5:18 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> The user has control over the DPDK internal lcore coremask, but this
> parameter can be autofilled with a bit more intelligence. If the user
> does not fill this parameter in, we use the lowest set bit in the
> current task CPU affinity. Otherwise, we
Hi Sorin,
Thank you for the patch.
Comments inlined.
Alin.
> -Mesaj original-
> De la: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] În numele Sorin Vinturis
> Trimis: Monday, December 21, 2015 9:12 PM
> Către: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subiect: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] datapath-windows: Accept
I got a donation for you, Email me for details via:: mr.ped...@qq.com
Best Regards
Mr. Pedro.
** This email is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify
the
That's what I was looking for!
Thank you Ben.
Kind regards,
Raúl
2016-01-18 0:21 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff :
> You described the typical way that "make check" tests such things, for
> cases where we had our doubts when we added a field. See, for example,
> the tests "ofproto-dpif -
Hi,
I have a query regarding tunneling in OVS.
I want to connect ovs with ODL (SDN Controller). I want to add flows from
the odl to ovs to set tun_src and tun_dst parameters. Can somebody please
help to understand which corresponding parameters should be sent from odl.
Thanks
Niti
On 01/19/2016 10:27 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> Multiple logical ports on the same chassis that were connected to the
>> same physical network via localnet ports were not able to send packets
>> to each other. This was
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Upcoming commits will introduce uses of the "property" message formats,
> which are used in OF1.3 and especially in OF1.4+, in Nicira extension
> messages for earlier versions of
One unintentional (?) blank line added, otherwise:
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> These are all just copies of the otherwise generic ofp_prop_header or
> ofp_prop_experimenter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
Small nits below,
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> These will have users in upcoming commits. Unlike the previously
> added helpers, there isn't any existing code that can immediately
> use them.
>
> Signed-off-by:
96
Because v-vitamin really helps your desire!
p{margin:10px 0;padding:0;}
table{border-collapse:collapse;}
h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6{display:block;margin:0;padding:0;}
img,a img{border:0;height:auto;outline:none;text-decoration:none;}
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:29 AM, Haggai Eran wrote:
> These two patches allow passing tunnelled flows without a match on the
> outer header TTL to the datapath. The first patch simply modifies ovs-dpctl
> to pass along fields that don't have a mask set. The second patch
With a minor function naming question below:
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> At first glance, OF1.4 queue properties look a lot like those for OF1.0
> to OF1.3, but in fact their different padding makes them
With a minor nit below:
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> The callers had some common code that could be reasonably encapsulated, so
> this commit does so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
>
With clarifications requested below:
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> lib/ofp-prop.c | 98 +++--
> lib/ofp-prop.h | 57
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> An upcoming commit will have a need to parse actions incrementally, so this
> change makes that easier to do.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> lib/ofp-actions.c | 20
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Several OpenFlow 1.3+ messages use TLV-based properties that take a
> common form. Until now, ofp-util has had some static functions for
> dealing with properties. Because properties
With the bug fix below,
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> This will have additional users in later commits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> lib/ofp-prop.c | 22 ++
>
There is still some inconsistency in using ‘=‘ vs. ‘:’ between a key and its
value when printing different messages. Is there a reason for this?
Nevertheless,
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Without this,
With a question (or two) for clarification below:
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Until now it's been pretty hard to properly test any of the queue support,
> because the dummy network device doesn't have any queues.
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> The callers call dump_stats_transaction() for OFPST_* messages and
> dump_transaction() for other messages, but the callee can easily
> distinguish the two types, so this commit
With minor questions below,
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> These will see increasing use in upcoming commits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> include/openflow/openflow-1.4.h | 27 -
>
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> In handle_group_mod() cases where adding a group failed, nothing freed the
> list of buckets, causing a leak. The same was true in every case of
> modifying a group. This commit fixes
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Experimenter stats are handled by code in ofp-msgs, and this struct isn't
> good for anything.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> include/openflow/openflow-1.2.h | 9
Hi Ben,
It see, thank you!
William
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 09:26:18AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> > I've installed sparse and cgcc and were playing with this tools. However,
> > I'm not sure whether it's working in current
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> This call to ofpbuf_trim() comes from a time when the packets passed to
> pinsched came directly from a dpif. For some time now that's no longer
> true--now they are messages generated
I think that sparse defines that internally.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:07:37AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> When I do "make C=1", where and how does the "__CHECKER__" get set/defined?
> I tried to dump preprocessor information "-dM -E" but I couldn't find any.
> Thank you!
>
>
This patch series adds support for MPLS to the OVS extension.
Sorin Vinturis (2):
[PATCH v2 1/2] datapath-windows: Support for OVS_KEY_ATTR_MPLS attribute
[PATCH v2 2/2] datapath-windows: Accept MPLS feature probe.
___
dev mailing list
This patch adds OVS_KEY_ATTR_MPLS to the OVS flow mechanism.
Tested using ping.
Tested using iperf (TCP and UDP).
Tested using DriverVerifier.
Signed-off-by: Sorin Vinturis
---
Compared to the previous patch, the code regarding MPLS push actions
was revised.
Currently all feature probe messages sent from userspace are
suppressed by the OVS extension.
This patch changes the current behaviour to allow feature probe
for MPLS.
Signed-off-by: Sorin Vinturis
---
v2: Added NL buffer parsing in feature probe function.
---
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> This code only cares about a very few kinds of OpenFlow messages, and it's
> unlikely that it will care about new ones, so replace the "switch" by "if"
> statements so that GCC won't
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> lib/ofp-util.h | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/ofp-util.h b/lib/ofp-util.h
> index
FYI,
I’ll review this series,
Jarno
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> The purpose of this series is the final patch, which is important for
> OVN and should also solve some problems that I've heard of in other
> controllers over the years.
>
> Ben Pfaff
Hi Ben,
When I do "make C=1", where and how does the "__CHECKER__" get set/defined?
I tried to dump preprocessor information "-dM -E" but I couldn't find any.
Thank you!
Regards,
William
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM, William Tu wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> It see, thank you!
>
The group hash selection extension is only for the OVS support for
OpenFlow 1.5.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:05:42PM +0100, Kashyap Thimmaraju wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thank you for clarifying this.
>
> Is it that selecting the fields to hash is from OpenFlow15?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kash
>
> On Tue,
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> The structures declared in ofp-msgs.h for messages definitions should not
> include an OpenFlow header (its presence is implied), but the definition of
> these messages did. This commit
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:56:27AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> FYI,
>
> I’ll review this series,
Thanks! Feel free to ask any questions that might be helpful, or to
review only the first few patches and ask for a rebase, etc.
___
dev mailing list
With a small nit below,
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
(snip)
> +struct ofp14_async_prop {
> +uint64_t prop_type;
> +enum ofputil_async_msg_type oam;
> +bool master;
> +uint32_t allowed10, allowed14;
With two questions for clarification below,
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
(snip)
> diff --git a/lib/ofp-util.c b/lib/ofp-util.c
> index 347cb61..48e2e8e 100644
> --- a/lib/ofp-util.c
> +++ b/lib/ofp-util.c
> @@
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> This seems a little better than a pair of bare arrays.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> include/openflow/openflow-common.h | 24 ++-
> lib/ofp-print.c
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> All of the callers of hash_words() and hash_words64() actually find it
> easier to pass in the number of bytes instead of the number of 32-bit
> or 64-bit words. These new functions
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> The OF1.0 through OF1.3 "set async config" set the whole configuration,
> OF1.4+ only update parts of it piecemeal, but the decoding function always
> set the whole configuration. This
Maybe the title should be “ofp-print: Print all async config messages the same
way.” instead?
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> We have a single function to decode all of these messages, so there's no
> reason to do it
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> OpenFlow 1.0 through 1.3 have a message OFPT_QUEUE_GET_CONFIG_REQUEST and
> its corresponding reply, for fetching a description of the queues
> configured on a given port. OpenFlow 1.4
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> An upcoming commit will add another kind of asynchronous message that
> should be handled in the same way as packet-ins.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
>
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> An upcoming commit will add another user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> lib/ofp-print.c | 27 ++-
> lib/ofp-util.c | 17 +
>
I never understood this special case anyway,
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> I don't have any real evidence that these special cases make a difference
> in real-world cases. The messages for the commits that add them
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> An upcoming commit will use this library from ofp-util instead of ofproto.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> lib/automake.mk | 4 +++-
> {ofproto =>
丈夫被冤狱迫害致死 郴州退休教师母子控告江泽民
【明慧网二零一五年十二月二十五日】谢丽萍,五十岁,湖南省郴州资兴鲤鱼江电厂子弟学校退休教师,儿子贺思源,二十一岁,学生,家住湖南省郴州市。丈夫贺雪兆与谢丽萍同在一所学校教书,一家人同修大法,其乐融融。
然而,江氏集团开始迫害法轮功后,谢丽萍和丈夫贺雪兆屡遭绑架和关押,二零零六年,被非法判刑八年的贺雪兆被迫害致死。
二零一五年八月九日,谢丽萍和儿子贺思源通过网络举报迫害法轮功的元凶江泽民,希望民众了解他们一家以及更多法轮功学员被迫害的真相。
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> It's actually harder to parse OF1.2/OF1.3 "packet-in" messages when
> ofp13_packet_in is involved than when the code just realizes that
> ofp13_packet_in = ofp12_packet_in + cookie.
>
>
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the reply.
It means that tun_src and tun_dst parameters in ovs cannot be configured
from ODL, as there is no corresponding OXM field defined for tun_src and
tun_dst in Openflow specifications. I have looked into the code, for
tun_src and tun_dst only NXM fields are defined but
From: Lorand Jakab
This commit relaxes the assumption that all packets have an Ethernet
header, and adds support for layer 3 flows. For each packet received on
the Linux kernel datapath the l2 and l3 members of struct ofpbuf are
intialized appropriately, and some functions
Add support for layer 3 GRE vports (non-tap aka non-VTEP).
This makes use of a separate vport type for GRE, rather than a new mode for
the existing (tap/VTEP) GRE vports as this fits more naturally with the
kernel where implementation of GRE and thus implementation of this feature
there.
In
From: Lorand Jakab
This is needed for sending a packet back to the datapath after a miss
upcall was processed. The presence of a layer 2 packet is signaled by
adding OVS_KEY_ATTR_ETHERNET to the packet metadata sent with the
ovs_packet netlink message. Layer 3 packets need
Extend support for layer 3 packets to cover non-IP packets.
This removes the assumption that the first octet of a layer 3 packet
indicates the IP protocol version - true for IP (v4 and v6), but not
for necessarily for other protocols.
The key motivation for this is to allow forwarding of MPLS
Thanks. I applied this to master, branch-2.5, and branch-2.4.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:25:03AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
>
> > On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > In handle_group_mod() cases where adding a
Hi Russell,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
> Multiple logical ports on the same chassis that were connected to the
> same physical network via localnet ports were not able to send packets
> to each other. This was because ovn-controller created a
This series implements support for layer 3 ports. By removing the
assumption that all packets/flows have Ethernet header, this series adds
generic support for layer 3 ports in OVS. Support for layer 3 GRE tunnels
is also added by this patchset.
The implementation automatically adds appropriate
The motivation is to allow pushing single bytes in
a manner to that already used for 16, 32 and 64 bit integers.
This will be used by a follow-up patch to allow layer 3 packet -
that is packets without an ethernet header - to be represented in flows.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
From: Lorand Jakab
These actions will allow L2->L3 and L3->L2 switching, and are supposed
to be added to flows installed in the datapath transparently by
ovs-vswitchd.
Signed-off-by: Lorand Jakab
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
Provide leading padding to allow pushing a value to a miniflow where
the value is not aligned to 64 bytes and no value has already been
pushed to the same word.
This will be used by a follow-up patch to allow layer 3 packet - that is
packets without an ethernet header - to be represented in
CentOS, RHEL and Fedora distributions ship with their own Open vSwitch
SELinux policy that is too strict and prevents Open vSwitch to work
normally out of the box.
As a solution, this patch introduces a new package which will "loosen"
up "openvswitch_t" SELinux domain so that Open vSwitch could
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
> Before this patch, physical.c build up the set of local datapaths for
> its own use. I'd like to use it in another module in a later patch, so
> pull it out of physical. It's now populated by the bindings module,
>
Thanks for the reviews. I applied patches 2 through 7 to master.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:44:30AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
>
> > On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > This call to ofpbuf_trim() comes from a time
BECAUSE YOU DESERVE IT! Is your lack of a degree holding you back from career
advancement? Are you having difficulty finding employment in your field of
interest because you dont have the paper to back it up even though you are
qualified? If you are looking for a fast and effective
"Qiu, Michael" writes:
> On 1/14/2016 5:18 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> The user has control over the DPDK internal lcore coremask, but this
>> parameter can be autofilled with a bit more intelligence. If the user
>> does not fill this parameter in, we use the lowest set bit
Hi,
Can anyone tell me how OVN will support SNAT/DNAT and VPN in the future?
In OVN, there is no use of neutron l3 agent, it uses native router for
east-west traffic, this is distributed and already supported. But for
SNAT/DNAT/VPN, currently still need l3 agent. What is your schedule about
no
On 01/19/2016 08:32 AM, Na Zhu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone tell me how OVN will support SNAT/DNAT and VPN in the future?
> In OVN, there is no use of neutron l3 agent, it uses native router for
> east-west traffic, this is distributed and already supported. But for
> SNAT/DNAT/VPN, currently
Hi Sorin,
Thanks for the patch.
Comments inlined.
Alin.
> -Mesaj original-
> De la: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] În numele Sorin Vinturis
> Trimis: Monday, December 21, 2015 9:12 PM
> Către: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subiect: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] datapath-windows: Support for
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> Multiple logical ports on the same chassis that were connected to the
> same physical network via localnet ports were not able to send packets
> to each other. This was because ovn-controller created a single patch
> port
Hi Alin,
Thanks for reviewing my patch.
Please see my answers to your comments inline.
-Sorin
-Original Message-
From: Alin Serdean
Sent: Tuesday, 19 January, 2016 14:28
To: Sorin Vinturis; dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] datapath-windows: Support for OVS_KEY_ATTR_MPLS
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:27:45PM +, Sugesh Chandran wrote:
> Adding a new field called dl_type in flow tunnel structure to verify the
> validity
> of tunnel metadata. This field avoids the need of resetting and validating the
> entire ipv4/ipv6 tunnel destination address which caused a
Hi Alin,
Thanks for reviewing this patch. Please see my answers inline.
-Sorin
-Original Message-
From: Alin Serdean
Sent: Tuesday, 19 January, 2016 12:29
To: Sorin Vinturis; dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] datapath-windows: Accept MPLS feature probe.
Hi Sorin,
Thank you
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> This isn't used yet but it will be in future commits.
>
> This also looks forward to supporting Open vSwitch extensions to OAM_*,
> which will be coming up soon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben
Mirroring is supposed to happen at most once for any destination on a given
packet, so the implementation keeps track of which mirrors have already
been used. However, until this commit it did that incorrectly: it
considered a mirror "used" even if it had been rejected on the basis of
VLAN. This
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 02:21:03PM +0800, hanxueluo wrote:
> Hi, guys I have a question about the code below in function
> "mirror_packet". Some mirrors in "mirrors" may be skipped because the
> select_vlan doesn't match ("if (vlans && !bitmap_is_set(vlans,
> vlan)"), but they may be useful for
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 04:09:00PM +0100, Kashyap Thimmaraju wrote:
> I would like to use the hash selection_method that OvS supports but with
> OpenFlow13.
>
> Could someone tell me the fields that are used as the input to the hash
> function for OpenFlow13 in OvS?
The default is a hash that
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 05:24:49PM +0530, niti Rohilla wrote:
> I have a query regarding tunneling in OVS.
>
> I want to connect ovs with ODL (SDN Controller). I want to add flows from
> the odl to ovs to set tun_src and tun_dst parameters. Can somebody please
> help to understand which
Hi Ben,
Thank you for clarifying this.
Is it that selecting the fields to hash is from OpenFlow15?
Thanks,
Kash
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 04:09:00PM +0100, Kashyap Thimmaraju wrote:
> > I would like to use the hash
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 04:05:27PM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> Add ovn-nb.{db,ovsschema}, ovn-sb.{db,ovsschema}, and vtep.{db,ovsschema}
>
> Signed-off-by: William Tu
Can we do this with a plugin, so that non-OVN installations don't have
this code?
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 04:05:26PM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> Add ovn-nbctl show, ovn-sbctl show, and ovn-sbctl lflow-list.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Tu
I think that we should probably start a new ovn/utilities/bugtool
directory for these, so that they can easily be
Adding a new field called dl_type in flow tunnel structure to verify the
validity
of tunnel metadata. This field avoids the need of resetting and validating the
entire ipv4/ipv6 tunnel destination address which caused a serious performance
drop.
Fixes: 3ae91c019019 ("tunneling: add IPv6 support
Hi,
I've installed sparse and cgcc and were playing with this tools. However,
I'm not sure whether it's working in current version of OVS.
The acinclude.m4 indeed sets the SPARSE related flags. After I do
"./configure", the Makefile shows:
CC = $(if $(C),env REAL_CC="gcc" CHECK="$(SPARSE) -I
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 09:26:18AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> I've installed sparse and cgcc and were playing with this tools. However,
> I'm not sure whether it's working in current version of OVS.
>
> The acinclude.m4 indeed sets the SPARSE related flags. After I do
> "./configure", the
84 matches
Mail list logo