Thanks for the review! Applied to master and branch-2.5
On 04/05/2016 11:28, "Jarno Rajahalme" wrote:
>Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
>
>> On May 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Daniele Di Proietto
>> wrote:
>>
>> After removing a flow from the
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On May 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Daniele Di Proietto
> wrote:
>
> After removing a flow from the dpcls classifier there might still be
> readers who have access to the flow, until the next grace period.
>
> Setting
After removing a flow from the dpcls classifier there might still be
readers who have access to the flow, until the next grace period.
Setting flow->cr.mask to NULL can cause concurrent readers to crash,
so this commit avoids doing it.
The crash can be reproduced, for example, by invoking an