Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] tests: Fix conntrack tests on windows.

2016-08-02 Thread Daniele Di Proietto
On 02/08/2016 13:19, "Joe Stringer" wrote: >On 2 August 2016 at 11:58, Daniele Di Proietto wrote: >> The conntrack unit tests seem to generate different megaflow masks on >> Windows. The megaflow masks depend on the internal ordering of the >> subtables,

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] tests: Fix conntrack tests on windows.

2016-08-02 Thread Joe Stringer
On 2 August 2016 at 11:58, Daniele Di Proietto wrote: > The conntrack unit tests seem to generate different megaflow masks on > Windows. The megaflow masks depend on the internal ordering of the > subtables, which are sorted using qsort(), based on their max priority. >

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] tests: Fix conntrack tests on windows.

2016-08-02 Thread Daniele Di Proietto
The conntrack unit tests seem to generate different megaflow masks on Windows. The megaflow masks depend on the internal ordering of the subtables, which are sorted using qsort(), based on their max priority. If two subtables have the same priority the ordering between them depend on the