> -Original Message-
> From: Daniele Di Proietto [mailto:diproiet...@vmware.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 4:44 AM
> To: Stokes, Ian
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC 1/1] netdev-dpdk.c: Add ingress-
> policing functionality.
>
Hi Ian,
On 07/04/2016 06:00, "Stokes, Ian" wrote:
>> > >71034a0..faf3583 100644
>> > >--- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
>> > >+++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
>> > >@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
>> > >
>> > > #include "rte_config.h"
>> > > #include "rte_mbuf.h"
>> > >+#include "rte_meter.h"
>> > >
> > >71034a0..faf3583 100644
> > >--- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> > >+++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> > >@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> > >
> > > #include "rte_config.h"
> > > #include "rte_mbuf.h"
> > >+#include "rte_meter.h"
> > > #include "rte_virtio_net.h"
> > >
> > > VLOG_DEFINE_THIS_MODULE(dpdk);
> > >@@ -193,6
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniele Di Proietto [mailto:diproiet...@vmware.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 12:19 AM
> To: Stokes, Ian
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC 1/1] netdev-dpdk.c: Add ingress-
> policing functionality.
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> We have gone through both your egress and ingress policing patches. And
> observed that both are two different approaches.
> Instead why don't we extend ingress policing patch to egress policing,
> as the ingress patch is in line with plain OVS kernel policing design.
>
> i.e, Can
dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Ian Stokes
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 7:47 PM
To: dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC 1/1] netdev-dpdk.c: Add ingress-policing
functionality.
This patch provides the modifications required in netdev-dpdk.c and vswitch
This patch provides the modifications required in netdev-dpdk.c and
vswitch.xml to enable ingress policing for DPDK interfaces.
This patch implements the necessary netdev functions to netdev-dpdk.c as
well as various helper functions required for ingress policing.
The vswitch.xml has been