On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 09:42:20AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:09:27AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:31:07PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
Rather than tracking the MPLS depth as a field in the
flow, which is an entirely poor place for it, just
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 05:34:49PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 09:42:20AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:09:27AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:31:07PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
Rather than tracking the MPLS depth as a
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:24:56PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 05:34:49PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 09:42:20AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:09:27AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:31:07PM +0900,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:31:07PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
Rather than tracking the MPLS depth as a field in the
flow, which is an entirely poor place for it, just track
the delta to the MPLS depth during translation.
This logic was developed while implementing recirculation
and intended
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:09:27AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:31:07PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
Rather than tracking the MPLS depth as a field in the
flow, which is an entirely poor place for it, just track
the delta to the MPLS depth during translation.
This
Rather than tracking the MPLS depth as a field in the
flow, which is an entirely poor place for it, just track
the delta to the MPLS depth during translation.
This logic was developed while implementing recirculation
and intended to be used to detect when recirculation should
occur. This variant
