On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:31:08PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
The sole purpose of this change is to avoid sparse warnings
about memset of zero length in the case where the zero field
of struct flow is zero bytes long, as is the case after
Remove mpls_depth field from flow.
Signed-off-by:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:57:08AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:31:08PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
The sole purpose of this change is to avoid sparse warnings
about memset of zero length in the case where the zero field
of struct flow is zero bytes long, as is the case
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:03:17AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:57:08AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:31:08PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
The sole purpose of this change is to avoid sparse warnings
about memset of zero length in the case where the
Thanks!
On Sep 25, 2013 5:38 PM, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:03:17AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:57:08AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:31:08PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
The sole purpose of this change is
The sole purpose of this change is to avoid sparse warnings
about memset of zero length in the case where the zero field
of struct flow is zero bytes long, as is the case after
Remove mpls_depth field from flow.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
---
This patch could trivially be:
