Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] sparse: Fix conflict between netinet/in.h and linux/in.h

2016-09-27 Thread Daniele Di Proietto
On 27/09/2016 15:19, "Joe Stringer" wrote: >On 8 June 2016 at 13:49, Daniele Di Proietto wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On 08/06/2016 13:30, "Ben Pfaff" wrote: >> >>>On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:07:32PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Wed, Jun

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] sparse: Fix conflict between netinet/in.h and linux/in.h

2016-09-27 Thread Joe Stringer
On 8 June 2016 at 13:49, Daniele Di Proietto wrote: > > > > > > On 08/06/2016 13:30, "Ben Pfaff" wrote: > >>On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:07:32PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:23:29PM -0700, Daniele Di Proietto wrote: >>> > linux/in.h

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] sparse: Fix conflict between netinet/in.h and linux/in.h

2016-06-08 Thread Daniele Di Proietto
On 08/06/2016 13:30, "Ben Pfaff" wrote: >On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:07:32PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:23:29PM -0700, Daniele Di Proietto wrote: >> > linux/in.h (from linux uapi headers) carries many of the same >> > definitions as netinet/in.h (from

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] sparse: Fix conflict between netinet/in.h and linux/in.h

2016-06-08 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:07:32PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:23:29PM -0700, Daniele Di Proietto wrote: > > linux/in.h (from linux uapi headers) carries many of the same > > definitions as netinet/in.h (from glibc). > > > > If linux/in.h is included after netinet/in.h,

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] sparse: Fix conflict between netinet/in.h and linux/in.h

2016-06-08 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:23:29PM -0700, Daniele Di Proietto wrote: > linux/in.h (from linux uapi headers) carries many of the same > definitions as netinet/in.h (from glibc). > > If linux/in.h is included after netinet/in.h, conflicts are avoided in > two ways: > > 1) linux/libc-compat.h

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] sparse: Fix conflict between netinet/in.h and linux/in.h

2016-06-08 Thread Joe Stringer
On 1 June 2016 at 19:23, Daniele Di Proietto wrote: > linux/in.h (from linux uapi headers) carries many of the same > definitions as netinet/in.h (from glibc). > > If linux/in.h is included after netinet/in.h, conflicts are avoided in > two ways: > > 1) linux/libc-compat.h