This might be an Eclipse related bug. Please try to run tests using
Run/Debug Configuration.
One thing, currently openwebbeans-tck/jsr299...xml does not include
interceptors test. To include them please add
to packages
section.
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2010/2/25 Eric Covener
> Hoping someone can get
Hi;
In fact, I have not done any performance related work on OWB so far. I just
want to kick start a discussion on Performance Problems/Solutions of OWB. I
will also create an JIRA issue.
Mainly, performance problems occur resulting from;
1* Lots of proxy usage
2* Bean resolution algorithms used
Hi;
Last couple of days there were some good discussion on how to proceed with
logging in OWB. There are some approaches:
1* Remove any hard log dependency library from classpath(For example :
removing log4.jar from classpath) and use java logging.
2* Use some third-party facades, for example usi
>>>Gurkan, thanks for the great work!
We thanks to all, not just me :)
>>>current OWB version is pretty stable
Yes, but if we pass TCK fully that will be very cool!
--Gurkan
2010/2/25 Mark Struberg
> Gurkan, thanks for the great work!
>
> current OWB version is pretty stable (taking apart the
Yes, I know Joe :) . That is great, thanks;
--Gurkan
25 Şubat 2010 00:02 tarihinde Joseph Bergmark yazdı:
> As I am sure you are already aware I've been working on some of the
> Decorator based TCK tests. I've even opened at least one bug to find out
> you fixed it a few hours beforehand :)
>
I've been running individual classes by going to either Debug or Run and
then the "Run Configurations" (or equivalent debug configurations) and then
typing in the class name beside the class radio button for a TestNG type. I
haven't tried running a single class or method from inside the result tab
Hoping someone can get me on the right track. I'm using eclipse 3.5.1
and latest testng. I can right-click the openwebbeans-tck/jsr299...xml
and run with 33/549 failures.
When i look in the testNG results tab, neither run or debug of
individual failers responds at all in the GUI. I get a very
un-g
As I am sure you are already aware I've been working on some of the
Decorator based TCK tests. I've even opened at least one bug to find out
you fixed it a few hours beforehand :)
Primarily I've been focused on:
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.decorators.invocation.DecoratorInvocationTests
(opened OW
Gurkan, thanks for the great work!
current OWB version is pretty stable (taking apart the bug in the javassist
library, which one can simply upgrade later by explicitly declaring a newer
version in a custom project instead of taking the default version one gets as a
transitive dependency.
LieG
Hello folks;
I have been working on standalone TCK (standalone means that not running in
container but includes EJB tests using OpenEJB) for a long time and decreased
the number of failed tests considerably. Some of those failed tests are related
with CDI-TCK bug and reported to CDI-TCK team.
InjectionPoint injections (both method and field based) in Decorators result in
null
Key: OWB-302
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-302
Project: OpenWeb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837867#action_12837867
]
James Carman commented on OWB-300:
--
I understand the whole idea about minimizing dependencies
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul J. Reder updated OWB-300:
--
Description: Currently OWB requires (is dependent on) log4j for logging.
This patch provides a means of ch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837857#action_12837857
]
Paul J. Reder commented on OWB-300:
---
SLF4J does appear to provide support for args and NLS b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Bergmark closed OWB-301.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.0)
M4
Assignee: Gurkan Erdogd
WebBeansDecorators getDecoratedTypes returns the types of the wrapped bean
instead of its list of decorated types
-
Key: OWB-301
URL: https://issues.ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Bergmark resolved OWB-299.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.0)
M4
Integrated change to always
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837831#action_12837831
]
Joe Bergmark commented on OWB-300:
--
Just wanted to provide some history on this. I believe t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837814#action_12837814
]
James Carman commented on OWB-300:
--
So, use SLF4J. Some folks don't like (including myself)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837809#action_12837809
]
Paul J. Reder commented on OWB-300:
---
I'm not an expert at Commons logging so I may have miss
20 matches
Mail list logo
