Sorry to bring this up again.
I now looked at many Apache projects for the last few days and talked with a
few people.
Basically they all switched over to java.util.logging!
With jdk1.5 the most problems are gone and it is actually now a pretty usable
standard. Plus it is THE standard on EE,
Hi,
At MyFaces we also had this discussion a couple of times [1] and, while most
of us liked Slf4j, we chose to go for JUL [2], because of the dependencies.
[1]
It looks like you need to add the JBoss repo both for the samples to work
from the binary archives, and for the source archives to build. Is that
acceptable for a milestone release?
I ran the reservation sample from a seperate machine (that didn't have
javaassist 3.11.0 in my local .m2 already),
Is that acceptable for a milestone release?
Samples are given as a source not as a binary. Its the user responsibility
to setup correct maven repository in his/her environments. I think that
this is not a release stopper issue.
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2010/3/3 Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org
It
Sounds good to me even if i definitely prefer self contained pom (ie.
avoid necessary information in settings.xml).
As it's not a release stopper issue, here is my
+1
JLouis
2010/3/3 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com:
And also same scenario exists to install from source (setting up some
+1 from me then.
This has been the case for a while, but previously the jboss repositories
were explicit in the top level pom.xml.
Sincerely,
Joe
2010/3/3 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
yes, IMO not a stopper! (isn't this already since a while?)
(yeah, i have the jboss repos in my
+1
regards,
gerhard
2010/3/3 Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Hi;
Finally release time :)
This is the OpenWebBeans M4 release [VOTE] process.
+1 for release.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
