Re: Need to switch to subclassing?

2010-05-11 Thread Mark Struberg
Yes, thanks Joe. For @Dependent it seems that it's pretty much clear. The question is if we should use the same mechanism for @NormalScoped beans also. But Gurkans argument with the EJB Interceptor spec is a strong indicator that it is not mandatory. LieGrue, strub --- Joseph Bergmark schrieb

[jira] Closed: (OWB-369) Static ContextsService in ContextFactory causes wrong webContextService used for multiple applications

2010-05-11 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gurkan Erdogdu closed OWB-369. -- Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu (was: YING WANG) Resolution: Fixed Thanks YING, I did commit. > Static Co

Re: Need to switch to subclassing?

2010-05-11 Thread Joseph Bergmark
I don't have Gurkan's experience in the spec, but this seems to be what section 7.2 is all about. When do you treat a method call as a "business method invocation", and how does that affect things like Decorators and Interceptor invocation. The only wording that hints this shouldn't work when cal

Re: Need to switch to subclassing?

2010-05-11 Thread James Carman
Here's something that will solve your problem, use AspectJ. On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Oki let me rephrase: I'd like to know if the spec (or Gavin) intends to > define this behaviour or if it is 'intentionally left undefined'. > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Tue, 5/1