Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

+1 lg reini > Am 04.02.2024 um 16:53 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos > : > > Hello, > > +1 > >> On Sun, Feb 4, 2024, 07:48 Gerhard Petracek wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> >> >>> Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg >>> : >>> >>> Hi lords and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.15

+1 lg reini > Am 09.01.2023 um 17:03 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > > | > Github

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.27

+1 lg reini > Am 02.06.2022 um 20:50 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > +1 > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 25.05.2022 um 02:24 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro >> : >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I'd like to get your help on the Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.27 release. >> The changes are fairly small,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

+1 lg reini > Am 04.05.2022 um 09:14 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 1:40 PM Mark Struberg > wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >>> Am 30.04.2022 um 15:21 schrieb Mark Struberg : >>> >>> Hi lords and ladies! >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

+1 lg reini > Am 14.12.2021 um 23:32 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Good evening! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on Releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.13. > > The following tickets got resolved: > Bug > > [MEECROWAVE-304 ] - > upgrade to log4j2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

+1 lg reini > Am 14.12.2021 um 23:24 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi lords and ladies! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25. > > The following tickets have been resolved: > Bug > > [OWB-1393 ] - OWB stops > firing

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.24

t;> OS name: "linux", version: "5.11.0-40-generic", arch: "amd64", family: >>>> "unix" >>>> >>>> [INFO] Results: >>>> [INFO] >>>> [ERROR] Failures: >>>> [ERROR] ProcessObserverMethodTest

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1394) fix (random) failing ProcessObserverMethodTest#testProcessObserverMethodIsInvoked

Reinhard Sandtner created OWB-1394: -- Summary: fix (random) failing ProcessObserverMethodTest#testProcessObserverMethodIsInvoked Key: OWB-1394 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1394

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.24

>>>>> SUCCESS [ >>>>> 37.805 s] >>>>> [INFO] Distribution Pkg ... >>>>> SUCCESS [ >>>>> 0.592 s] >>>>> [INFO] Gradle ShadowJar Plugin Integration >>>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.24

thub <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le jeu. 25 nov. 2021 à 09:51, Reinhard Sandtner > a écrit : > &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.24

hey, sorry but i am not able to unzip the src zip file openwebbeans-2.0.24-source-release.zip openwebbeans-2.0.24-source-release.zip: ASCII text and the sha512 is also not correct. lg reini > Am 24.11.2021 um 14:43 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro : > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.12

+1 thx, lg reini > Am 05.08.2021 um 12:41 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > my own +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github |

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.11

+1 lg reini > Am 27.04.2021 um 10:53 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 27.04.2021 um 07:35 schrieb Benjamin Marwell : >> >> +1 (nb). >> >> I tested the jakarta classifier and I am very happy with it.  >> >> Thanks! >> - Ben >> >> On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, 23:45

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.22 - take 2

+1 lg reini > Am 17.03.2021 um 19:43 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > +1 > > Le mer. 17 mars 2021 à 19:24, Thomas Andraschko > a écrit : > >> +1 >> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofre schrieb am Mi., 17. März 2021, >> 18:42: >> >>> +1 (non binding) >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> Le 17 mars 2021 à

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebbeans 2.0.21

+1 lg reini > Am 06.01.2021 um 20:49 schrieb Thomas Andraschko > : > > +1 > thanks! > > Am Mi., 6. Jan. 2021 um 09:34 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > jeano...@gmail.com>: > >> +1 >> >> Thanks >> >> Le mer. 6 janv. 2021 à 09:30, Romain Manni-Bucau a >> écrit : >> >>> My own +1 >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.19 - take 2

+1 > Am 19.10.2020 um 10:19 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > +1 > > Le lun. 19 oct. 2020 à 10:12, Arne Limburg > a écrit : > >> +1 >> >> >> -- >> >> Arne Limburg - Enterprise Architekt >> >> >> >> >> OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH >> Poststraße 1, 26122 Oldenburg >> Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.18

+1 lg reini > Am 09.09.2020 um 09:55 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > +1 > > Le mer. 9 sept. 2020 à 08:49, Vicente Rossello a > écrit : > >> +1 >> >> Tested, everything works in our build >> >> El mié., 9 sept. 2020 8:36, Thomas Andraschko >> >> escribió: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Romain

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.17

+1 > Am 10.06.2020 um 07:13 schrieb Gurkan Erdogdu : > > +1 > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 9:36 AM Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau | Blog >> | Old Blog >>

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.14

+1 lg reini > Am 11.01.2020 um 16:27 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi folks! > > I've run all the tasks to release OWB 2.0.14 > > Here is the list of fixed bugs: > > Bug > > • [OWB-1280] - NPE in filterExcludedJars > • [OWB-1303] - AbstractOwbBean does not conserve the actual user

Release OWB 2.0.14

Hey folks, yesterday i got pinged on IRC if we can release OWB 2.0.14 because they need the fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1303 if there are no objections i can start with the release probably end of next week… if someone can

Re: Next releases (2.0.12)?

+1 but maybe wait til johnzon is available for meecrowave? > Am 26.09.2019 um 10:18 schrieb Thomas Andraschko > : > > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau schrieb am Do., 26. Sep. 2019, > 06:46: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> Should we release owb and meecrowave? >> Anything pending for you? >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.11

+1 lg reini > Am 27.05.2019 um 11:31 schrieb Thomas Andraschko > : > > +1 > > Mark Struberg schrieb am Mo., 27. Mai 2019, > 10:55: > >> +1 >> >> txs and LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >>> Am 26.05.2019 um 10:41 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >> : >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> Here is the vote for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.8

+1 lg reini > Am 27.05.2019 um 12:57 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > +1 > > Le lun. 27 mai 2019 à 10:57, Mark Struberg a > écrit : > >> +1 >> >> txs and LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >>> Am 26.05.2019 um 10:58 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >> : >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> Here is the vote for

Re: [DISCUSS] also move the Meecrowave repo to GITbox?

+1 Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 09.05.2019 um 09:15 schrieb Thomas Andraschko > : > > +1 > > Am Do., 9. Mai 2019 um 09:01 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > >> +1 but maybe after next release - we didnt cut one since last fixes right? >> What about post

Re: [DISCUSS] move OpenWebBeans core repo to GIT?

+0 Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 03.05.2019 um 15:12 schrieb Sven Ruppert : > > +1 > >> Am 03.05.2019 um 13:31 schrieb Mark Struberg : >> >> hi folks! >> >> Do we want to move OWB core to GIT? >> >> wdyt? >> >> I'd be +1 >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >

Re: [meecrowave] release today?

+1 > Am 25.02.2019 um 08:41 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > not sure you read jira notifications but a user asked for a release, I'm > planning to try to do it this morning, please shout if there is any issue > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau

Re: [VOTE] Apache Meecrowave 1.2.5 vote

+1 Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 02.02.2019 um 09:27 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 30.01.2019 um 09:59 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : >> >> Hi guys, >> >> Since some users need it, here is the release for Meecrowave 1.2.5. Also >> note we upgraded to CXF

Re: [VOTE] Apache Meecrowave 1.2.5

+1 lg reini > Am 09.01.2019 um 12:26 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > Here is the vote for Meecrowave 1.2.5. > > We fixed 21 issues: > > PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatusDevelopment > [image: Critical] [image: Bug] MEECROWAVE-91 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.10

+1 lg reini > Am 09.01.2019 um 11:34 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > I'd like to call a vote for OWB 2.0.10. Issues fixed are: > > [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1273 > Extension wildcard types > leak parameterized types >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.9

+1 lg reini > Am 20.12.2018 um 10:33 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 from me as well > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.6

+1 lg reini > Am 18.12.2018 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Andraschko > : > > +1 > > could you please also add your key for the future to the OWB svn root KEYS > file? It seems that we 2 have key files. > > Am Di., 18. Dez. 2018 um 12:16 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha < > daniels...@apache.org>: > >> +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8

+1 looks good, thx lg reini > Am 09.11.2018 um 10:36 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > * builds fine* sha1 fine* sha512 fine* signature fine* rat check fine* > LICENSE fine* NOTICE fine > > txs for rolling the release! > +1 > LieGrue,strub > > >On Wednesday, 7 November 2018, 17:40:17 CET,

[jira] [Commented] (MEECROWAVE-155) Kotlin based sample

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16649919#comment-16649919 ] Reinhard Sandtner commented on MEECROWAVE-155: -- hey [~elexx] the more samples

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.4

+1 > Am 21.09.2018 um 15:06 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1, thanks Mark > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > | Blog > > | Old > Blog >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.7

+1 > Am 30.08.2018 um 14:45 schrieb Joseph Bergmark : > > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 4:56 AM Mark Struberg > wrote: > >> Good morning ladies and gents! >> >> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.7 >> >> The following tickets got resolved: >> >> Bug >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.2

+1 lg reini > Am 14.07.2018 um 15:04 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github | > LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.6

+1 src builds checked LICENSE, NOTICE, md5, sha and sig tested with meecrowave and my simple testapp… everything works fine lg reini > Am 06.06.2018 um 14:16 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog >

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.5

+1 src builds fine, NOTICE ok sha, md5 ok sig ok tested with my sample meecrowave app -> works fine lg reini > Am 28.04.2018 um 22:52 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > good evening! > > I'd like to call a VOTE to release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.5. > > The following

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-1240) Non-static inner classes should not get picked up as CDI Beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner resolved OWB-1240. Resolution: Fixed > Non-static inner classes should not get picked up as CDI Be

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1240) Non-static inner classes should not get picked up as CDI Beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner updated OWB-1240: --- Attachment: OWB-1240.patch > Non-static inner classes should not get picked up as CDI Be

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OWB-1240) Non-static inner classes should not get picked up as CDI Beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16440546#comment-16440546 ] Reinhard Sandtner edited comment on OWB-1240 at 4/17/18 7:48 AM: - added unit

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1240) Non-static inner classes should not get picked up as CDI Beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16440546#comment-16440546 ] Reinhard Sandtner commented on OWB-1240: added unit-test to reproduce the issue

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1240) Non-static inner classes should not get picked up as CDI Beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner updated OWB-1240: --- Attachment: (was: owb-inner-class-sample.zip) > Non-static inner classes should not

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (OWB-1240) Non-static inner classes should not get picked up as CDI Beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner updated OWB-1240: --- Comment: was deleted (was: was not able to reproduce it in a unit-test i think the problem

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OWB-1240) Non-static inner classes should not get picked up as CDI Beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16440526#comment-16440526 ] Reinhard Sandtner edited comment on OWB-1240 at 4/17/18 7:29 AM

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1240) Non-static inner classes should not get picked up as CDI Beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16440526#comment-16440526 ] Reinhard Sandtner commented on OWB-1240: was not able to reproduce it in a unit-test i think

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1240) Non-static inner classes should not get picked up as CDI Beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner updated OWB-1240: --- Attachment: owb-inner-class-sample.zip > Non-static inner classes should not get picked

[jira] [Created] (MEECROWAVE-100) exclude integration-test modules from deployment

Reinhard Sandtner created MEECROWAVE-100: Summary: exclude integration-test modules from deployment Key: MEECROWAVE-100 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-100 Project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.1

+1 src builds license, notice ok signature, sha and md5 ok tested with my simple testapp and everything works > Am 26.02.2018 um 23:15 schrieb Gerhard Petracek : > > i've upgraded [1] to v1.2.1 and all tests look fine. > -> +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > [1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.4

+1 src builds LICENSE fine NOTICE fine md5, sha1 ok gpg fine tested with meecrowave and my small test app and everything works fine lg reini > Am 19.02.2018 um 10:54 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 too > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau

Re: next up Meecrowave

works on my machine too ;) thx romain lg reini > Am 18.02.2018 um 18:01 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Fixed, was related to some test order. A test was using cxf in a close > callback and creating a default bus since we already cleaned out bus. Issue > was that the

Re: [meecrowave] next release after t9.0.3 upgrade?

+1 - lets do it ;) lg reini > Am 24.01.2018 um 15:06 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > johnzon issue I spoke about we can want to include: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-154 > > all the todo are clear on my side for a release, anything we miss? > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.0

+1 NOTICE, LICENSE looks good source builds md5, sha, signature ok > Am 21.12.2017 um 11:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.3

+1 source builds -> tck pass notice and license ok sha, md5 und signature ok lg reini > Am 21.12.2017 um 11:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > |

[jira] [Commented] (MEECROWAVE-76) meecrowave:run ignores meecrowave.properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16238185#comment-16238185 ] Reinhard Sandtner commented on MEECROWAVE-76: - pr applied - thx [Ravisankar-Challa|https

[jira] [Resolved] (MEECROWAVE-76) meecrowave:run ignores meecrowave.properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner resolved MEECROWAVE-76. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 > meecrowave:run igno

[jira] [Updated] (MEECROWAVE-76) meecrowave:run ignores meecrowave.properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner updated MEECROWAVE-76: Description: meecrowave:run ignores meecrowave.properties see https

[jira] [Created] (MEECROWAVE-76) meecrowave:run ignores meecrowave.properties

Reinhard Sandtner created MEECROWAVE-76: --- Summary: meecrowave:run ignores meecrowave.properties Key: MEECROWAVE-76 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-76 Project: Meecrowave

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.2

+1 Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 16.10.2017 um 20:35 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > +1 > > Le mer. 11 oct. 2017 à 16:49, Joseph Bergmark a > écrit : > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> >>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome John D Ament as Apache OpenWebBeans committer

Welcome John! lg reini > Am 06.10.2017 um 10:45 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Welcome John! > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > |

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1

+1 lg reini > Am 31.08.2017 um 08:34 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 30.08.2017 um 03:11 schrieb John D. Ament : >> >> Looks good to me, ship it +1 >> >> Tested with Hammock + Geronimo Config, both passing fine

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-0.3.1

+1 thx romain lg reini > Am 28.04.2017 um 17:45 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > as mentionned on the list here is the vote for meecrowave 0.3.1 > > > Staging repo: > *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1027 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.3

+1 (nonbinding) lg reini > Am 16.04.2017 um 00:56 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi folks! > > I've run the tasks to ship OWB 1.7.3. > > The following bugs got fixed > > Bug > > • [OWB-1172] - getResources doesn't work in OWB Arquillian container > for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.2

+1 (non-binding), all fine thanks romain! checked the following: - source builds fine - LICENSE - NOTICE - sha1 - md5 - signature build meecrowave with the new version tested with my apps lg reini > Am 31.01.2017 um 19:31 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi all! > >

Re: [Meecrowave] 0.3.0 wishlist

+1 thx romain lg reini > Am 31.01.2017 um 11:21 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Cause of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1170 I think we should > likely also release OWB (and upgrade meecrowave dep), any objection to run > both votes in parallel (concrelty if

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.1

+1 lg reini > Am 04.01.2017 um 07:30 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 02.01.2017 um 14:02 schrieb Mark Struberg : >> >> Hi folks! >> >> Please VOTE for the release of Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.1. >> >>

Re: [microwave] site preview

hey, romain, the site looks really great :D thx for your work! i hope i can check out microwave in the next few days… sounds like fun ;) lg reini > Am 31.10.2016 um 12:54 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > last week I worked a bit on getting a microwave

Re: [microwave] name selection

hey, i like meecrowave because it sounds like microEE ;) would be cool if we can get OWB in the name… but currently no idea meecrowave is my favorite lg reini > Am 31.10.2016 um 15:25 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > microwave is cool but hard to defend. > Romain also

Re: microwave landed

hey, i like the idea ;) really cool i hope i can take a look this weekend ping me if you need help - sounds really interesting lg reini > Am 18.10.2016 um 23:47 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > pushed at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

+1 (non-binding) app works fine signature ok building from src successful lg reini > Am 31.08.2016 um 22:50 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > New take for OWB-1.7.0 > > Repo is > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/ > > Source

Re: do an OWB release?

hey, i think we should go through all open issues before… maybe i will find some time to help next week lg reini > Am 27.07.2016 um 10:47 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi! > > Are there anything we need before shipping the next owb release? > > > LieGrue, > strub

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1091) bootstrap upgrade for our site

Reinhard Sandtner created OWB-1091: -- Summary: bootstrap upgrade for our site Key: OWB-1091 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1091 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Task

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1087) fix failing integration tests with java 8

Reinhard Sandtner created OWB-1087: -- Summary: fix failing integration tests with java 8 Key: OWB-1087 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1087 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1089) OpenWebBeansJsfPlugin is pretty much empty

Reinhard Sandtner created OWB-1089: -- Summary: OpenWebBeansJsfPlugin is pretty much empty Key: OWB-1089 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1089 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1090) remove jsf12 module for owb-2.0

Reinhard Sandtner created OWB-1090: -- Summary: remove jsf12 module for owb-2.0 Key: OWB-1090 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1090 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Task

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1088) fix samples with java 8 and update to tomcat7/8

Reinhard Sandtner created OWB-1088: -- Summary: fix samples with java 8 and update to tomcat7/8 Key: OWB-1088 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1088 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue

Re: branch name for owb-2.0

Hey, I would keep it cdi-2.0 because the owb-* branches are maintenance branches and this is just a development-feature-branch imo Lg Reini Am 25.08.2015 um 08:58 schrieb Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Hi Reinhard! Thanks for starting the CDI-2.0 work and setting up the branch.

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1086) initial setup for cdi-2.0

Reinhard Sandtner created OWB-1086: -- Summary: initial setup for cdi-2.0 Key: OWB-1086 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1086 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Task Affects

[jira] [Assigned] (OWB-1065) Incorrect matching of parameterized events

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner reassigned OWB-1065: -- Assignee: Reinhard Sandtner Incorrect matching of parameterized events

[jira] [Assigned] (OWB-1040) Lifecycle events fired during bean discovery do not follow specification sequence

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner reassigned OWB-1040: -- Assignee: Reinhard Sandtner Lifecycle events fired during bean discovery do not follow

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1040) Lifecycle events fired during bean discovery do not follow specification sequence

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner updated OWB-1040: --- Issue Type: Task (was: Bug) Lifecycle events fired during bean discovery do not follow

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1040) Lifecycle events fired during bean discovery do not follow specification sequence

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner updated OWB-1040: --- Priority: Minor (was: Critical) Lifecycle events fired during bean discovery do not follow

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1040) Lifecycle events fired during bean discovery do not follow specification sequence

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14519397#comment-14519397 ] Reinhard Sandtner commented on OWB-1040: your extension expects non-portable

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-1062) JspFactory.getDefault() returns null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner resolved OWB-1062. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.5.1 JspFactory.getDefault() returns null

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1052) improve our test coverage for the owb-web module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14517107#comment-14517107 ] Reinhard Sandtner commented on OWB-1052: added it-folder to webbeans-web

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-1061) Surplus and missing @Initialized and @Destroyed events

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner resolved OWB-1061. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.5.1 bq. an event with qualifier @Destroyed

[jira] [Assigned] (OWB-1061) Surplus and missing @Initialized and @Destroyed events

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner reassigned OWB-1061: -- Assignee: Reinhard Sandtner Surplus and missing @Initialized and @Destroyed events

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1062) JspFactory.getDefault() returns null

Reinhard Sandtner created OWB-1062: -- Summary: JspFactory.getDefault() returns null Key: OWB-1062 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1062 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Closed] (OWB-1033) ProcessBeanAttributes doesn't return the right Annotated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner closed OWB-1033. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 1.5.1) 1.5.0 the problem

[jira] [Reopened] (OWB-1033) ProcessBeanAttributes doesn't return the right Annotated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner reopened OWB-1033: tested with CDI-Sandbox and tests fail stochastic test fails with java7 and java8

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1033) ProcessBeanAttributes doesn't return the right Annotated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14291932#comment-14291932 ] Reinhard Sandtner commented on OWB-1033: hi antoine, i think it was a bug and i've

[jira] [Assigned] (OWB-1033) ProcessBeanAttributes doesn't return the right Annotated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner reassigned OWB-1033: -- Assignee: Reinhard Sandtner ProcessBeanAttributes doesn't return the right Annotated

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-1033) ProcessBeanAttributes doesn't return the right Annotated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner resolved OWB-1033. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.5.0 ProcessBeanAttributes doesn't return the right

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-1024) DecoratorBeanBuilder : Number of TypeArguments must match - Decorated Type: 2 Delegate Type: 1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner resolved OWB-1024. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.5.0 1.2.7 fixed in1.5.0

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1024) DecoratorBeanBuilder : Number of TypeArguments must match - Decorated Type: 2 Delegate Type: 1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14200547#comment-14200547 ] Reinhard Sandtner commented on OWB-1024: Hi, the problem is, that the super

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OWB-992) Decorator generic delegate attribute must be same with decorated type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14161844#comment-14161844 ] Reinhard Sandtner edited comment on OWB-992 at 10/7/14 12:42 PM

[jira] [Reopened] (OWB-992) Decorator generic delegate attribute must be same with decorated type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner reopened OWB-992: --- applying fix to branch own-1.2.x Decorator generic delegate attribute must be same with decorated

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-992) Decorator generic delegate attribute must be same with decorated type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner resolved OWB-992. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.7 applied patch in own_1.2.x also Decorator

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-992) Decorator generic delegate attribute must be same with decorated type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner resolved OWB-992. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.5.0 Bruno i've fixed it in trunk (1.5.0) is this ok

[jira] [Closed] (OWB-995) BeanManager must throw Exception if some methods are called before LifecycleEvents

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Sandtner closed OWB-995. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.5.0 patch applied by struberg BeanManager must throw

  1   2   >