[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1416) Possible misintepretation of spec regarding Unproxyable bean types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17650004#comment-17650004 ] Mark Struberg commented on OWB-1416: I agree with Romain that a) the spec is not clear and b) our

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1416) Possible misintepretation of spec regarding Unproxyable bean types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17628121#comment-17628121 ] Alexander Larsen commented on OWB-1416: --- A toggle would indeed work. I can not promise a PR in the

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1416) Possible misintepretation of spec regarding Unproxyable bean types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17627686#comment-17627686 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1416: - What about doing a pr to fix it? If not too intrusive a

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1416) Possible misintepretation of spec regarding Unproxyable bean types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17627676#comment-17627676 ] Alexander Larsen commented on OWB-1416: --- OK. I still think this should be reconsidered ;-) Even

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1416) Possible misintepretation of spec regarding Unproxyable bean types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17627658#comment-17627658 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1416: - Maybe but this quote also does not bring any

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1416) Possible misintepretation of spec regarding Unproxyable bean types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17627641#comment-17627641 ] Alexander Larsen commented on OWB-1416: --- The proxy only needs to implement all types of the bean, if

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1416) Possible misintepretation of spec regarding Unproxyable bean types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17627615#comment-17627615 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1416: - Well yes and no, `getReference` is a good example of the

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1416) Possible misintepretation of spec regarding Unproxyable bean types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17627601#comment-17627601 ] Alexander Larsen commented on OWB-1416: --- This is what i think might be the misinterpretation of the

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1416) Possible misintepretation of spec regarding Unproxyable bean types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17627582#comment-17627582 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1416: - Hmm, for a managed bean (= plain class, not a producer)

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1416) Possible misintepretation of spec regarding Unproxyable bean types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17627549#comment-17627549 ] Alexander Larsen commented on OWB-1416: --- Thanks for the rapid reply! I'm not sure i entirely

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1416) Possible misintepretation of spec regarding Unproxyable bean types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17627487#comment-17627487 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1416: - Hi, since spec requires subclassing, interface usage is