[jira] Reopened: (OWB-289) Owb return 2 beans for Indirect specialized producer beans

2010-03-01 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg reopened OWB-289: --- Assignee: Mark Struberg (was: Gurkan Erdogdu) it seems that we now wrongly disable falsely identified

[jira] Commented: (OWB-289) Owb return 2 beans for Indirect specialized producer beans

2010-03-01 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839739#action_12839739 ] Mark Struberg commented on OWB-289: --- The problem seems to be that the AbstractProducerBean#o

[jira] Commented: (OWB-289) Owb return 2 beans for Indirect specialized producer beans

2010-03-01 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839766#action_12839766 ] Mark Struberg commented on OWB-289: --- from rereading the spec, getBeanClass() seems to be imp

[jira] Commented: (OWB-289) Owb return 2 beans for Indirect specialized producer beans

2010-03-01 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839778#action_12839778 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-289: I really do not understand your comments :) Can you u

[jira] Commented: (OWB-289) Owb return 2 beans for Indirect specialized producer beans

2010-03-01 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839788#action_12839788 ] Mark Struberg commented on OWB-289: --- it's a bit complicated. My parent class includes 2 pro

AW: svn commit: r917636 - in /openwebbeans/trunk: ./ atinject-tck/ samples/ samples/conversation-sample/ samples/ejb-sample/ samples/ejb-telephone/ samples/guess/ samples/jms-sample/ samples/jsf2sampl

2010-03-01 Thread Mark Struberg
gurkan, please wait! I've found the problem The getClassMethodWithTypes, but do not check for the return Type! --- gerdo...@apache.org schrieb am Mo, 1.3.2010: > Von: gerdo...@apache.org > Betreff: svn commit: r917636 - in /openwebbeans/trunk: ./ atinject-tck/ > samples/ samples/conversati

Re: AW: svn commit: r917636 - in /openwebbeans/trunk: ./ atinject-tck/ samples/ samples/conversation-sample/ samples/ejb-sample/ samples/ejb-telephone/ samples/guess/ samples/jms-sample/ samples/jsf2s

2010-03-01 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Release has already started! Please do not worry! This release is not 1.0.0GA and can always contain bugs! (Bug is inevitable :)) --Gurkan From: Mark Struberg To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Mon, March 1, 2010 8:33:40 PM Subject: AW: svn commit: r91763

AW: svn commit: r917636 - in /openwebbeans/trunk: ./ atinject-tck/ samples/ samples/conversation-sample/ samples/ejb-sample/ samples/ejb-telephone/ samples/guess/ samples/jms-sample/ samples/jsf2sampl

2010-03-01 Thread Mark Struberg
explanation: Method superMethod = ClassUtil.getClassMethodWithTypes(pb.getBeanClass(), method.getName(), Arrays.asList(method.getParameterTypes())); if (superMethod != null) { producerBeanListHelper.add(pb); This is a) missing the return type check superMethod.getReturnType().isAssignabl

Re: AW: svn commit: r917636 - in /openwebbeans/trunk: ./ atinject-tck/ samples/ samples/conversation-sample/ samples/ejb-sample/ samples/ejb-telephone/ samples/guess/ samples/jms-sample/ samples/jsf2s

2010-03-01 Thread Mark Struberg
Yes, true, but that one would be pretty easy to fix, and hits me in production ... LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu schrieb am Mo, 1.3.2010: > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu > Betreff: Re: AW: svn commit: r917636 - in /openwebbeans/trunk: ./ > atinject-tck/ samples/ samples/conversation-sample/ sample

[jira] Commented: (OWB-289) Owb return 2 beans for Indirect specialized producer beans

2010-03-01 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839806#action_12839806 ] Mark Struberg commented on OWB-289: --- here comes the solution: WebBeansUtil#1814

[jira] Commented: (OWB-289) Owb return 2 beans for Indirect specialized producer beans

2010-03-01 Thread YING WANG (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839821#action_12839821 ] YING WANG commented on OWB-289: --- Thanks Mark, are the 2 methods shares the same name, parameters

[jira] Commented: (OWB-289) Owb return 2 beans for Indirect specialized producer beans

2010-03-01 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839845#action_12839845 ] Mark Struberg commented on OWB-289: --- hi Ying! That was my first try, but then I realised th

[VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-M4

2010-03-01 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Hi; Finally release time :) This is the OpenWebBeans M4 release [VOTE] process. I've staged the releases artifacts here: Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content -

AW: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-M4

2010-03-01 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 from me too. PS: @OWB-289: since I now know _what_ the problem is, it is really easy to do a workaround by moving my other producerMethod to an own class. The problem was that this is part of a pretty complicated usecase, and I only did see my program fail randomly, which made me frankly

[jira] Commented: (OWB-289) Owb return 2 beans for Indirect specialized producer beans

2010-03-01 Thread YING WANG (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839861#action_12839861 ] YING WANG commented on OWB-289: --- I would presume the exact being-extended method in the super cl

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-M4

2010-03-01 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi; > > Finally  release time  :) > > This is the OpenWebBeans M4 release [VOTE] process. > Any pointers on testing the staged OWB release for the maven-impaired? -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com