Re: OWB-2.0.0 to be released soon

[John D. Ament]

Hmm so DeltaSpike is seeing 11 test failures with OWB2.

https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/DeltaSpike/job/DeltaSpike%20OWB%202.0.0/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/

CDI Ctrl Servlet - it looks like a weird error, the impl of this bean
hasn't been changed in 2 years.  Not sure if this is a new validation in
place.

ClasspathResourceTest - I'm not sure if the path is getting skewed due to
duplicate resources, or the same resource being added multiple times.

JSF & Scheduler look like changes in the dependency structure.  If on
purpose, I'll push up a fix sometime tomorrow.

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 10:04 AM Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> 2 things to check before the release:
>
> 1. se API (not covered by tck and poorly covered by us ATM)
> 2. the fastMatching flag should get removed if we can (created due to 1
> tck)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>
> 2017-06-18 15:41 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
>
>> OWB itself did always ignore it and log a warning. This code did not get
>> changed for a while.
>>
>> But we have/had a bug in the arquillian connector which lead to blowing
>> up on NoClassDefFound.
>> I need to check whether we fixed this already with another commit.
>>
>> The ticket is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1179
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> > Am 18.06.2017 um 13:45 schrieb John D. Ament :
>> >
>> > Just wondering, did you change the behavior when a class isn't found to
>> > ignore the bean? Prior versions of OWB would throw an exception.
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 4:43 PM Mark Struberg > >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Yes, it should 'just work' afaict.
>> >> We even kept the SPI the same.
>> >> We most likely will add an async event related API for better
>> integration
>> >> within TomEE in the future.
>> >> But this should still be perfectly backward compatible as OWB will
>> provide
>> >> a default implementation anyway!
>> >>
>> >> If you catch any (unexpected) problems then just ping us.
>> >>
>> >> txs and LieGrue,
>> >> strub
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> Am 17.06.2017 um 22:36 schrieb John D. Ament :
>> >>>
>> >>> So... just to confirm.  Outside of changing the geronimo specs,
>> taking a
>> >> OWB 1.x profile that I may have will just work with OWB 2?
>> >>>
>> >>> John
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 1:53 PM Mark Struberg
>> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> Yes, it is 1:1 backward compatible.
>> >>>
>> >>> The only thing you need to update is the jcdi and common-annotations
>> API:
>> >>>
>> >>> 
>> >>>org.apache.geronimo.specs
>> >>>geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec
>> >>>1.0-SNAPSHOT
>> >>> 
>> >>>
>> >>> 
>> >>>org.apache.geronimo.specs
>> >>>geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec
>> >>>1.0-SNAPSHOT
>> >>> 
>> >>>
>> >>> They will be released this week as well.
>> >>>
>> >>> LieGrue,
>> >>> strub
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>  Am 17.06.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Ludovic Pénet :
>> 
>>  Is it a drop i' remplacement ?
>>  If yes, I would gladky test this works, before test driving the new
>> >> features.
>> 
>>  Ludovic
>> 
>>  Le 17 juin 2017 19:38:01 GMT+02:00, Mark Struberg > >
>> >> a écrit :
>>  Hi folks!
>> 
>>  We are finished with implementing all CDI-2.0 features and now
>> >> successfully pass the standalone TCK!
>>  A recent owb-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT is deployed to the Apache Snapshots
>> >> repository [1].
>>  This get's deployed via Jenkins each night.
>> 
>>  It would be great if you could try it out and give us some feedback!
>>  We gonna release it somewhen next week.
>> 
>>  txs and LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
>>  [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
>> 
>>  --
>>  Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma
>> >> brièveté.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>

Re: OWB-2.0.0 to be released soon

[Mark Struberg]

OWB itself did always ignore it and log a warning. This code did not get 
changed for a while.
 
But we have/had a bug in the arquillian connector which lead to blowing up on 
NoClassDefFound.
I need to check whether we fixed this already with another commit.

The ticket is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1179

LieGrue,
strub



> Am 18.06.2017 um 13:45 schrieb John D. Ament :
> 
> Just wondering, did you change the behavior when a class isn't found to
> ignore the bean? Prior versions of OWB would throw an exception.
> 
> John
> 
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 4:43 PM Mark Struberg 
> wrote:
> 
>> Yes, it should 'just work' afaict.
>> We even kept the SPI the same.
>> We most likely will add an async event related API for better integration
>> within TomEE in the future.
>> But this should still be perfectly backward compatible as OWB will provide
>> a default implementation anyway!
>> 
>> If you catch any (unexpected) problems then just ping us.
>> 
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 17.06.2017 um 22:36 schrieb John D. Ament :
>>> 
>>> So... just to confirm.  Outside of changing the geronimo specs, taking a
>> OWB 1.x profile that I may have will just work with OWB 2?
>>> 
>>> John
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 1:53 PM Mark Struberg 
>> wrote:
>>> Yes, it is 1:1 backward compatible.
>>> 
>>> The only thing you need to update is the jcdi and common-annotations API:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>org.apache.geronimo.specs
>>>geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec
>>>1.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>org.apache.geronimo.specs
>>>geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec
>>>1.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> 
>>> 
>>> They will be released this week as well.
>>> 
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>> 
>>> 
 Am 17.06.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Ludovic Pénet :
 
 Is it a drop i' remplacement ?
 If yes, I would gladky test this works, before test driving the new
>> features.
 
 Ludovic
 
 Le 17 juin 2017 19:38:01 GMT+02:00, Mark Struberg 
>> a écrit :
 Hi folks!
 
 We are finished with implementing all CDI-2.0 features and now
>> successfully pass the standalone TCK!
 A recent owb-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT is deployed to the Apache Snapshots
>> repository [1].
 This get's deployed via Jenkins each night.
 
 It would be great if you could try it out and give us some feedback!
 We gonna release it somewhen next week.
 
 txs and LieGrue,
 strub
 
 
 [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
 
 --
 Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma
>> brièveté.
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Re: OWB-2.0.0 to be released soon

[John D. Ament]

Just wondering, did you change the behavior when a class isn't found to
ignore the bean? Prior versions of OWB would throw an exception.

John

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 4:43 PM Mark Struberg 
wrote:

> Yes, it should 'just work' afaict.
> We even kept the SPI the same.
> We most likely will add an async event related API for better integration
> within TomEE in the future.
> But this should still be perfectly backward compatible as OWB will provide
> a default implementation anyway!
>
> If you catch any (unexpected) problems then just ping us.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 17.06.2017 um 22:36 schrieb John D. Ament :
> >
> > So... just to confirm.  Outside of changing the geronimo specs, taking a
> OWB 1.x profile that I may have will just work with OWB 2?
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 1:53 PM Mark Struberg 
> wrote:
> > Yes, it is 1:1 backward compatible.
> >
> > The only thing you need to update is the jcdi and common-annotations API:
> >
> > 
> > org.apache.geronimo.specs
> > geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec
> > 1.0-SNAPSHOT
> > 
> >
> > 
> > org.apache.geronimo.specs
> > geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec
> > 1.0-SNAPSHOT
> > 
> >
> > They will be released this week as well.
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > > Am 17.06.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Ludovic Pénet :
> > >
> > > Is it a drop i' remplacement ?
> > > If yes, I would gladky test this works, before test driving the new
> features.
> > >
> > > Ludovic
> > >
> > > Le 17 juin 2017 19:38:01 GMT+02:00, Mark Struberg 
> a écrit :
> > > Hi folks!
> > >
> > > We are finished with implementing all CDI-2.0 features and now
> successfully pass the standalone TCK!
> > > A recent owb-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT is deployed to the Apache Snapshots
> repository [1].
> > > This get's deployed via Jenkins each night.
> > >
> > > It would be great if you could try it out and give us some feedback!
> > > We gonna release it somewhen next week.
> > >
> > > txs and LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
> > >
> > > --
> > > Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma
> brièveté.
> >
>
>

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1195) do a codestyle analysis check and apply fidings before releasing OWB-2.0.0

[Mark Struberg (JIRA)]

Mark Struberg created OWB-1195:
--

 Summary: do a codestyle analysis check and apply fidings before 
releasing OWB-2.0.0
 Key: OWB-1195
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1195
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Mark Struberg
Assignee: Mark Struberg
 Fix For: 2.0.0


We should run the code analysis checks and Sonar and apply findings which make 
sense.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Jenkins build is back to stable : OpenWebBeans-trunk-deploy » JSR-365 TCK runner #353

[Apache Jenkins Server]

See 

Jenkins build is back to stable : OpenWebBeans-trunk-deploy #353

[Apache Jenkins Server]

See