Re: some CDI-4.0 work

Hi Mark Did you push any build-tools changes anywhere? My current OWB build fails looking for org.apache.openwebbeans.build-tools:checkstyle-rules:4.0-SNAPSHOT. Just curious if I could check it out somewhere and build it to get further. Thanks Jon On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 10:23 PM Mark Struberg

Re: InjectionResolver query

On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 6:56 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Indeed we can always add a pluggable (by config) cache but how many cases > does it cover? > To be fair, OWB is pretty friendly in terms of being pluggable. If the 2 hash maps in InjectionResolver had protected access rather than

Re: InjectionResolver query

> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le mar. 8 nov. 2022 à 15:36, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@g

Re: InjectionResolver query

et/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > >

InjectionResolver query

Hey folks I've run into an interesting problem on the TomEE-side, running an EAR file. This seems to end up with 2 injection resolvers for the application: one for the web part of the application, and a parent for the EAR. When resolving by type at runtime, with large archives, we've seen a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

+1 Jon On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:24 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi lords and ladies! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25. > > The following tickets have been resolved: > Bug > > [OWB-1393 ] - OWB stops > firing

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.24

+1. I've checked licence headers on the source files, and checked the LICENSE and NOTICE files in the distribution. Additionally, I did run the tests. I also encounter the test failure here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1394 - although it consistently seems to work for me with a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.22 - take 2

+1 Jon On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 2:56 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi lords and ladies! > > I'd like to call a 2nd VOTE for releasing Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.22 > > We did fix the following tickets: > > Bug > > [OWB-1371

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.13

+1 On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 1:30 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is the vote for our beloved Apache OpenWebBeans v2.0.13. > > This is mainly a bugfix release for bean configurator support and OSGi > version ranges. Here is the changelog: > > 1–3 of 3View in Issue Navigator > < >

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1300) ClassCastException in org.apache.webbeans.web.context.WebContextsService

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16957087#comment-16957087 ] Jonathan Gallimore commented on OWB-1300: - I have created a Pull Request to address this issue

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1300) ClassCastException in org.apache.webbeans.web.context.WebContextsService

Jonathan Gallimore created OWB-1300: --- Summary: ClassCastException in org.apache.webbeans.web.context.WebContextsService Key: OWB-1300 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1300 Project

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.11

ww.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le mar. 28 mai 2019 à 11:30, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > I have a test failu

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.11

I have a test failure on the TomEE side. I haven't had a chance to dig into the detail yet, but the test log is here: https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/90277d26af6bf7a936ce32a62ca1282f Specifically, its this test that fails:

Re: [DISCUSS] move OpenWebBeans core repo to GIT?

+1 On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 12:31 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > hi folks! > > Do we want to move OWB core to GIT? > > wdyt? > > I'd be +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.10

+1 On Sat, 12 Jan 2019, 08:33 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO +1 > > Le ven. 11 janv. 2019 à 10:43, Mark Struberg a > écrit : > > > +1 LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > Am 09.01.2019 um 11:34 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > >: > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > I'd like to call a vote for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.6

+1 On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 2:26 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

nha < > daniels...@gmail.com> > > > > > geschrieben: > > > > > > > > > > > Ok. patch updated again. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 10:3

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

I think you can keep ASM 7, but leave this: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13/commits/cb600aada79427ab7eff31e7da92038b6af6ed19#diff-f58069aef7df21dd8d4b0bd3546a747aR104 as `return Opcodes.V1_6;`. Hope that helps. Jon On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 1:26 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1

Re: Releasing OWB-1.7.5?

I'll take a look tonight. Thanks Mark! Jon On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi folks! > > How does OWB-1.7.5-SNAPSHOT look like in TomEE-1.7.5-snap? > > If no problems did pop up then I'd love to run the OWB-1.7.5 release this > afternoon. >

Re: Releasing OWB-1.7.5?

+1 On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, 10:53 Mark Struberg, wrote: > Hi folks! > > How does OWB-1.7.5-SNAPSHOT look like in TomEE-1.7.5-snap? > > If no problems did pop up then I'd love to run the OWB-1.7.5 release this > afternoon. > > Please shout out if there is any showstopper.

Re: Release for Java 9 and 10?

skip them but also > happy to try to push it if you want to put it in the scope. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > 2018-04-13 17:39 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>: > > Thanks fo

Re: Release for Java 9 and 10?

r OWB i'm quite limited in bandwidth but i can pby do another xbean > release this month. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > 2018-04-13 11:44 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>: > >

Release for Java 9 and 10?

Hi, I hate to even ask, but I was wondering if there was any chance of 1.2.x and a 1.7.x release which would include the latest xbean-asm updates for Java 9 and 10? I'm happy to help in any way I can. Cheers Jon

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1236) Update to XBean Asm 6 Shaded 4.7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16409698#comment-16409698 ] Jonathan Gallimore commented on OWB-1236: - Patches provided in these PRs:   [https://github.com

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1236) Update to XBean Asm 6 Shaded 4.7

Jonathan Gallimore created OWB-1236: --- Summary: Update to XBean Asm 6 Shaded 4.7 Key: OWB-1236 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1236 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type