I have had some good success with OWB and JSF running on Jetty. There are two projects where I'd be happy to use 2.0, but both are still under development and I don't know how much useful feedback I can offer.
-- Lobos Studios | Phone: 877.919.4WEB | LobosStudios.com | Facebook.com/LobosStudios | @LobosStudios Web Development - Mobile Development - Helpdesk/Tech Support - Computer Sales & Service Acer Authorized Reseller - Computers, Windows and Android Tablets, Accessories Steve Sobol - CEO, Senior Developer and Server Jockey st...@lobosstudios.com -----Original Message----- From: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de] Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 13:43 To: openwebbeans-user <u...@openwebbeans.apache.org> Cc: openwebbeans-dev <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org> Subject: Re: OWB-2.0.0 to be released soon Yes, it should 'just work' afaict. We even kept the SPI the same. We most likely will add an async event related API for better integration within TomEE in the future. But this should still be perfectly backward compatible as OWB will provide a default implementation anyway! If you catch any (unexpected) problems then just ping us. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 17.06.2017 um 22:36 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > So... just to confirm. Outside of changing the geronimo specs, taking a OWB > 1.x profile that I may have will just work with OWB 2? > > John > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 1:53 PM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> > wrote: > Yes, it is 1:1 backward compatible. > > The only thing you need to update is the jcdi and common-annotations API: > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId> > <artifactId>geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec</artifactId> > <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> > </dependency> > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId> > <artifactId>geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec</artifactId> > <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> > </dependency> > > They will be released this week as well. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 17.06.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Ludovic Pénet <l.pe...@senat.fr>: > > > > Is it a drop i' remplacement ? > > If yes, I would gladky test this works, before test driving the new > > features. > > > > Ludovic > > > > Le 17 juin 2017 19:38:01 GMT+02:00, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> a > > écrit : > > Hi folks! > > > > We are finished with implementing all CDI-2.0 features and now successfully > > pass the standalone TCK! > > A recent owb-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT is deployed to the Apache Snapshots repository > > [1]. > > This get's deployed via Jenkins each night. > > > > It would be great if you could try it out and give us some feedback! > > We gonna release it somewhen next week. > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ > > > > -- > > Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté. >
