Re: Any Topics for next community Tech Interchange April-11 @3pm GMT / 11am EST / 8am PST

2018-09-25 Thread Vincent S Hou
Hi Chetan, The greatest news can go to that OpenWhisk officially first-time released all the 12 modules under Apache as incubator project. We have walked through the voting processes for all the modules, and we passed all the vote mails. The download links are available here:

OpenWhisk officially first-time released all the 12 modules under Apache as incubator project.

2018-09-25 Thread Vincent S Hou
Hi OpenWhiskers, After everybody's great effort, OpenWhisk has now successfully releases all the 12 designated modules: OpenWhisk CLI Catalog Wskdeploy Apigateway Client Go library Runtime Nodejs Runtime Java Runtime Docker Runtime Swift Runtime Python Runtime PHP under Apache as incubator

Re: Where and how do you deploy Apache OpenWhisk?

2018-09-25 Thread Dascalita Dragos
Hi Ben, Thanks for starting this thread. I'll chime in with my POV. I see the deployment largely structured around 3 layers: 1. Container Management. This layer contains logic to spin up a Kubernetes or Mesos cluster. It could be a managed cluster ( Azure Container Service, Amazon ECS for

Bi-weekly Tech Interchange call tomorrow - add agenda topics here

2018-09-25 Thread Dascalita Dragos
Hi, Please add to this thread any agenda items you'd like to discuss at the Tech Interchange call tomorrow. Call details: Web Meeting: Tech Interchange (bi-weekly): - Day-Time: Wednesdays, 11AM EDT (Eastern US), 5PM CEST (Central Europe), 3PM UTC, 11PM CST (Beijing) - Zoom:

Re: Asking opinions about "Learning OpenWhisk" a book from O'Reilly I am writing

2018-09-25 Thread Carlos Santana
Congrats Michelle !! TOC looks good, you have the architecture and building an app cover, and in 3 languages that's more than good IMO One important info I would not leave out is WebActions what they and how to deal with them. I see many users having trouble finding good examples on building a

Re: Active acks from invoker to controller

2018-09-25 Thread Carlos Santana
With concurrency of 1 like we have by default, the action container is not free up until the log collection is finished, so the controller should not schedule a new activation to the invoker until then, regardless if it's blocking or not blocking. I like the idea of the invoker be more detailed

Re: Asking opinions about "Learning OpenWhisk" a book from O'Reilly I am writing

2018-09-25 Thread David Breitgand
Hi Michele, Congratulations on the O'Reilly book proposal acceptance! I also suggest including wskadmin in the Appendixes. Another suggestion for the Appendixes is Lean OpenWhisk: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/3886 I believe it will be merged by the time you write the

Re: Asking opinions about "Learning OpenWhisk" a book from O'Reilly I am writing

2018-09-25 Thread Michael Marth
Hi Michele, Congratulations for getting an O'Reilly contract. That's awesome! Also, this list is totally the right place for this topic (IMO). I have a little comment about the TOC: the way I read it your intended audience are OW users (action developers), not developers of OW itself. Is that

Active acks from invoker to controller

2018-09-25 Thread Christian Bickel
Hi, today, we execute the user-action in the invoker, send the active-ack back to the controller and collect logs afterwards. This has the following implication: - controller receives the active ack, so it thinks the slot on the invoker is free again. - BUT the invoker is still collecting logs,