Re: Logstore usage during `activation get`

2018-10-04 Thread David P Grove
"James W Dubee" wrote on 10/04/2018 11:45:34 AM: > From: "James W Dubee" > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > Date: 10/04/2018 11:49 AM > Subject: Re: Logstore usage during `activation get` > > On a similar note, I don't think we should be storing activation > responses at all. > +1 Responses can

Re: Logstore usage during `activation get`

2018-10-04 Thread Nick Mitchell
from a usability perspective, there is something quite attractive about having ready access to logs (and activation records generally)... while developing. i think most of the woes we encounter with logs come from high volume actions (either exercised in prod, or during a high volume test)? i

Re: Logstore usage during `activation get`

2018-10-04 Thread James W Dubee
Hey guys, For scalability concerns, I think it is preferable to separate logs from activation records entirely. Doing so would require users to use the logs API, or whatever tools are provided by the underly logging service. We should focus on serverless technology and delegate log handling to