[slack-digest] [2019-03-06] #random

2019-03-06 08:24:13 UTC - Michele Sciabarra: Hello all, look at this: ``` $ wsk action create hello-rust src/lib.rs --docker actionloop/actionloop-rust-v1.32 ok: created action hello-rust $ wsk action invoke hello-rust -r { "greeting": "Hello, stranger" } $ wsk action invoke hello-rust -r -p

[slack-digest] [2019-03-06] #general

2019-03-06 00:41:06 UTC - Dominic Kim: anyone notice `github actions` are now available on our apache repo? Are you mentioning this or this

Re: Tech Interchange meeting Notes & Video posted

Thanks Matt + Rodric I opened the invoker clustered resource PR here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4326 And added a wiki page with diagram and presentation attached here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Cluster+Manager+Resources+in+Invoker Thanks

Re: Tech Interchange meeting Notes & Video posted

Thanks Matt - I made an editing pass on the notes. Amazing that you can capture all that, everytime! -r On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 12:26 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote: > Thanks Rodric for hosting with some very interesting and exciting topics > from Tyson and Rodric himself and looking forward to

Tech Interchange meeting Notes & Video posted

Thanks Rodric for hosting with some very interesting and exciting topics from Tyson and Rodric himself and looking forward to enabling more deterministic Container pool mgmt. along with exploring the browser-based paradigms Rodric demonstrated with Digital Ocean droplets. Video:

Re: feedback on using Apache OpenWhisk name

Yes, Apache is clear that they prefer uses like "powered by" (or similar) as outlined here: https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ specifically: https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/#poweredby In my experience, they get very agitated when Apache project names are used outside of

Re: change the default action context to omit api key

There is a new comment on the issue related to this patch [1] which suggests a deployment time parameter for enabling the feature that restricts whisk API keys being available to all actions. I looked at the PR and think it can be done with some changes in the controller and the tests. We already

Re: feedback on using Apache OpenWhisk name

Thanks! I’ve already submitted a change request to update the content on the DigitalOcean page (as posted in the issue) to use the Apache link instead. -r > On Mar 6, 2019, at 5:35 AM, Carlos Santana wrote: > > +1 use apache.openwhisk.org > > > > - Carlos Santana > @csantanapr > >>> On

Rust for OpenWhisk

Thanks to the effort of Roberto Diaz who provided the actionloop in rust, I built the Rust for OpenWhisk (ActionLoop powered, of course): ``` $ wsk action create hello-rust src/lib.rs --docker actionloop/actionloop-rust-v1.32 ok: created action hello-rust $ wsk action invoke hello-rust -r {

Re: feedback on using Apache OpenWhisk name

+1 use apache.openwhisk.org - Carlos Santana @csantanapr > On Mar 6, 2019, at 4:40 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 9:33 AM Carlos Santana wrote: >> >> ...they don’t use the https url to the Apache >> openwhisk website > > Good point, IMO the only URL to

Re: feedback on using Apache OpenWhisk name

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 9:33 AM Carlos Santana wrote: > > ...they don’t use the https url to the Apache > openwhisk website Good point, IMO the only URL to advertise is openwhisk.apache.org - http or https is an implementation detail (and all redirects are in place AFAICS) but "apache" is

Re: feedback on using Apache OpenWhisk name

I don’t see anything wrong, and it looks like fair use of “Powered by ...” I found a similar thing on Digital Ocean market place [1]  using the “Power by Apache OpenWhisk” but they don’t use the https url to the Apache openwhisk website. [1]