Re: OpenWhisk Apps on Knative

I echo Dave’s words To add: OpenWhisk was born before Kubernetes was mainstream OpenWhisk took advantage at that time of Docker CLI and Docker Engine avoiding to re-invent the wheel. OpenWhisk was build and deploy using bash and ant at one point, then gradle, ansible, compose and later

Re: OpenWhisk Apps on Knative

"Michele Sciabarra" wrote on 03/13/2019 04:08:15 PM:= > > So, is the focus of the project shifting on Knative? Dropping the > current invoker and controller, keeping the runtimes and run them > with Knative? > My 2 cents as an individual is that there is quite a bit of value in being able to

Re: OpenWhisk Apps on Knative

Don, I agree with you. The simplicity is what I like about OpenWhisk as well. As a contrast, I was at a meetup about Knative a couple of months ago, and at that time basically only the build part was mature enough that it could be demoed. I remember asking my self what's the point of all this

Re: OpenWhisk Apps on Knative

I work for Red Hat, which is touting Knative as "serverless" pretty hard. My take: OpenWhisk is so much easier to use. I can write a small function, run one command and BOOM I have a function. I wrote a really involved tutorial and blog series about Knative, but after I was finished I learned

Re: OpenWhisk Apps on Knative

Relevant question indeed! If the controller and invoker were to be dropped, what would be the incentive for using OpenWhisk at all, and not go all in on Knative instead? I'm currently working on an RFI from a customer where I see OpenWhisk as a good fit, but knowing what's going on with Knative

Re: OpenWhisk Apps on Knative

So, is the focus of the project shifting on Knative? Dropping the current invoker and controller, keeping the runtimes and run them with Knative? -- Michele Sciabarra mich...@sciabarra.com - Original message - From: Priti Desai To: OpenWhisk Dev Subject: OpenWhisk Apps on

OpenWhisk Apps on Knative

Hi Whiskers, Matt and I have been working on building OpenWhisk apps on Knative. We have created build template for NodeJS runtime along with build and service files for various use cases. I have created PR under Dev Tools with all our work:

Re: Updating the docker version to the latest one

+1 - Carlos Santana @csantanapr > On Mar 13, 2019, at 5:39 AM, Dominic Kim wrote: > > Hi, > > Recently CVE in docker engine is reported. > https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-5736 > > So I created this issue and want to start working on it. >

Updating the docker version to the latest one

Hi, Recently CVE in docker engine is reported. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-5736 So I created this issue and want to start working on it. https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/4336 But I want to figure out if anybody would be broken by this first. Since

[slack-digest] [2019-03-12] #general

2019-03-12 00:49:07 UTC - Bruce Adams: Sorry to go silent for for a few days. I find myself wondering how we expect Rust developers to use the Rust runtime. I think of usual OpenWhisk language support as having two and sometimes three modes of use. 1) send in a single source file as the action

[slack-digest] [2019-03-12] #random

2019-03-12 00:07:04 UTC - Carlos Santana: https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3UDXSFA6/p1552349224090300 2019-03-12 00:07:08 UTC - Karan Kamatgi: Has anyone used serverless framework with openwhisk and tried deploying a