I'd like to kick off a discussion to assess the project's readiness for
graduation from the incubator.
Per Rodric's recent stats [1], the community has developed nicely in terms
of code contribution.
We've released a number of software components following the Apache release
process. We are
Hi
Thanks for the warm welcome :) I'm glad to be part of your community
and I'll do my best to help you on the way to be TLP
Best regards
Krzysztof
On 14.03.2019 15:05, Matt Rutkowski wrote:
Welcome Krzysztof!
Appreciate the great support from all our mentors as we indeed complete
the
Matt Priti I see the PR got merged/closed with no discussion
Here is my initial feedback:
I wasted like 30 minutes looking for the hello.js openwhisk action and how
this was used to build final docker image to be use in knative.
Never found it, after reading every file I think I finally realize
+1 Yay!!
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 9:31 AM Dave Grove wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/02/21 17:29:40, Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> > I have reviewed the the CLI related repos listed below and think we
> should
> > delay release of the CLI until the following PRs/issues are addressed.
>
> The pending PRs have all
I'm guessing you already tried passing the name of the function as
parameter and got "is not a function" :-)
function man(param) { param["main"](param) }
At least for me I consider best practice to users to avoid packaging into a
single file/zip multiple functions
I think OpenWhisk gave a good
On 2019/02/21 17:29:40, Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> I have reviewed the the CLI related repos listed below and think we should
> delay release of the CLI until the following PRs/issues are addressed.
The pending PRs have all been merged and I believe we are finally ready to go
ahead with
My 2 cents (from a personal perspective - these views are my own and not my
employers yada yada)...
Despite the marketing hype, (at the moment) knative isn't a serverless
platform like openwhisk.
It's a Containers-as-a-Service platform (which scales from zero) than a
Functions-as-a-Service
This is an interesting idea. Lambda has a nice feature of being able to
create functions from an S3 file containing the source zip, which means you
don't have to upload the same code for each different function. Not having
something can make deployments unnecessarily long on OpenWhisk when you
I've now opened an infrastructure ticket to move the pluggable event
provider back into Apache OpenWhisk.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18011
Once this is done and the repo is ready, I'll work on migrating the S3
plugin back upstream too.
On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 16:29, Rodric Rabbah
I like the idea. In particular, it would be very helpful in implementing an
idea I had some time ago: deployment of Jupyter Notebooks as actions! (Here I
refer to Python based notebooks mostly)
Normally you have some code in it that you develop (and test) interactively,
but the problem is:
2019-03-14 03:00:14 UTC - Jin Choi: @Rodric Rabbah I am running Openwhisk
system on my servers and here's one question for you.
For Openwhisk deployment using ansible can we make it BLUE-GREEN deployment?
Ansible playbooks in `${OPENWHISK_HOME}/ansible` doesn't seem so.
2019-03-14 02:55:39 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: That suggests your controller didn’t
come back cleanly. Checked the logs? In /tmp/wsklogs
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1552532139263500?thread_ts=1552532139.263500=C3TPCAQG1
2019-03-14 03:01:46 UTC - Xue Shuai: @chetanm Thanks
The project has a total of 217 unique contributors across 32 repositories,
and 145 of these are contributors to the "openwhisk" repo.
There are (across all the repos):
- 19 contributors with at least 100 commits
- 7 contributors with at least 50 commits (and fewer than 100 commits)
- 34
13 matches
Mail list logo
