Re: Pausing actions, waiting for human input etc.

2019-03-27 Thread Matt Sicker
What you're describing sounds a lot like what Jenkins does for user input steps in a build. A stateful task manager is required to do this as you've been exploring. For debugging purposes, do you think it may be simpler to write a dedicated service around this, or would a more serverless approach

Re: Pausing actions, waiting for human input etc.

2019-03-27 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, Thank you everybody for you replies. I understand implementing this directly in OpenWhisk is challenging, and especially this comment from Olivier: On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 6:12 PM Olivier Tardieu wrote: > ...Alternatively, the dynamic creation of trigger-like and rule-like things > can be

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client JS (incubating) 3.19.0

2019-03-27 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 7:53 PM Matt Sicker wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 12:07, James Thomas wrote: > > Non-binding +1: > > Matt Sicker > > I think this might be wrong now that I'm a mentor? Or does it only > apply to the IPMC vote?... Matt's vote is binding both here (as an incubation

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client JS (incubating) 3.19.0

2019-03-27 Thread James Thomas
Hey Matt, I'm not sure about that - probably something to ask the mentors! ;) Dave Grove did tell me that dev-list votes from IPMC members roll over to the IPMC mailing list vote thread automatically, so you don't need to vote again. On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 18:53, Matt Sicker wrote: > > On Tue,

[slack-digest] [2019-03-26] #random

2019-03-27 Thread OpenWhisk Team Slack
2019-03-26 06:52:16 UTC - Jin Choi: I am running an Openwhisk system on my own. A client of mine asked if he could make an action for zipping up hundreds of jpeg files which are fetched from another server so that his clients can download zipped files of images. But I see the maximum output