Re: enhancing scanCode to respect gitignore files

I opened a PR https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-utilities/pull/57 to bundle the relevant parts of the "pathspec" library. This avoids pip install in all downstream clients. The pathspec library is Mozilla Public License 2.0 [1]. My reading of the Mozilla License, their FAQ [2] and the

Re: enhancing scanCode to respect gitignore files

> Am I understanding correctly that we'd need to go change the .travis.yaml files for pretty much every openwhisk repo to do the `pip install pathspec` as part of its install phase? That's right. I could mitigate this by having scancode itself install the module (via) pip if necessary.

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)

+1 to the full checklist. Neat that there's an easy to use python script for helping validate. On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 07:48, David P Grove wrote: > > > > The Apache OpenWhisk Community has voted to make the first Apache release > of the OpenWhisk "Package Alarm", "Package Cloudant" and "Package

Re: Current status of Jenkins setup for OpenWhisk

Hi OpenWhiskers, I have already made the Jenkins pipeline working. I resolved the issue about the constantly failing test case by enabling the memory limit of docker on each openwhisk VM. Three VMs are able to run three instances of OpenWhisk deployment and test at the same time. Normally the

Re: release verification help

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 17:21, James Thomas wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 17:40, Carlos Santana wrote: > > > > Using the website I would think it doesn’t count as verifying the artifacts. > > > > Just playing devils advocate here. > > > > Going to a website and selecting something from a

Re: Execute OpenWhisk action via AWS Lambda

This sounds pretty neat. Could it lead to OpenWhisk being like the Kubernetes of serverless? :) On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 02:34, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Hi Chetan, > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 7:09 AM Chetan Mehrotra wrote: > > ...We recently did a POC around executing actions deployed on

Updating aka and scala deps

Chetan has updated the following library dependencies Akka modules - 2.5.12 -> 2.5.21 Akka HTTP - 10.1.1 -> 10.1.8 Scala - 2.12.7 - 2.12.8 In https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4316 These are required for #4315 and #4217. The PR is ready to merge now. Will wait 24hrs before

Re: Execute OpenWhisk action via AWS Lambda

Hi Chetan, On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 7:09 AM Chetan Mehrotra wrote: > ...We recently did a POC around executing actions deployed on OpenWhisk > via AWS Lambda... I think you forgot a link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inception ;-) > ...3. Invoker can delegate execution to Lambda based on

[slack-digest] [2019-03-28] #kubernetes

2019-03-28 17:38:06 UTC - Roberto Previtera: bye https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C4J3R7JFL/p1553794686000200 2019-03-28 17:38:27 UTC - Roberto Previtera: I will contact you here in the slack channel with a few questions on the status of the projects.

[slack-digest] [2019-03-28] #general

2019-03-28 04:51:46 UTC - Xue Shuai: Hi, everyone, do i have to redeploy the entire openwhisk with openwhisk.yml every time I change parameters, eg. invoker_user_memory, or just redeploy invoker with invoker.yml? Thank you.

Execute OpenWhisk action via AWS Lambda

Hi Team, We recently did a POC around executing actions deployed on OpenWhisk via AWS Lambda. Some of the key objectives of this POC were 1. Supports most of OpenWhisk features 2. Developers use std OpenWhisk tooling to create functions 3. Invoker can delegate execution to Lambda based on some