Re: New architecture proposal

Dear Dominic, Thanks for your proposal. It is very inspirational and it looks promising. I'd like to ask some questions about the fall over/failure recovery mechanism of the scheduler component. IIUC, a scheduler instance hosts multiple queue managers. If a scheduler is down, we will lose

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Composer (v0.11.0-incubating, rc2)

Hi, I am +1 to release OpenWhisk Composer: 6bc3405280176e55618853ee8eae284c6e603806 Verified with rcverify & spot checks. Release verification checklist for reference: [X] Download links are valid. [X] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [X] DISCLAIMER is included. [X] Source code

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes (v1.13.0-incubating, rc1)

Hi, I am +1 to release: * OpenWhisk Runtime Docker: 48b8f4a239864edc178eb392a7eef287857a7a96 * OpenWhisk Runtime Dotnet: 50df3bad2588c7b37425fad037ae3df73198ca22 * OpenWhisk Runtime Java: 9f27bab28905bdb66dc3526b5843eaaa6f9d026c * OpenWhisk Runtime Node.js:

[slack-digest] [2019-04-04] #general

2019-04-04 01:34:42 UTC - Dominic Kim: Hi https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1554341682061300 2019-04-04 01:48:53 UTC - Dominic Kim: I want to start the discussion for my new architecture proposal

[slack-digest] [2019-04-04] #random

2019-04-04 11:03:31 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: A good read https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3UDXSFA6/p1554375811056900 2019-04-04 11:24:44 UTC - Markus Thömmes: FWIW, a lot of this applies to the

Re: New architecture proposal

Dear David, Matt, and Dascalita. Thank you for your interest in my proposal. Let me answer your questions one by one. @David Yes, I will(and actually already did) implement all components based on SPI. The reason why I said "breaking changes" is, my proposal will affect most of components