+1 for incremental.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Dascalita Dragos
wrote:
> *"...**pushing the images we build to **DockerHub** (a couchdb image
> included)"*
> I'm working with my team these days at the CouchDB image.
> Should we include it now in the repo or push it
Note the links are to Justin Brestler's repository.
-r
> On Feb 10, 2017, at 1:42 PM, Carlos Santana wrote:
>
> Hi Priti Desai
>
> From your description this sound like a good solution/app to have as
> sample app in company with a blog post
>
> I don't think it fits
The proposal is not yet implemented. Please add to the issue.
Parameters are not allowed on sequences deliberately - until we resolve the
scoping issue (in case we need to migrate schemes for example).
-r
With the recent changes we've made to OpenWhisk to make the mapping of keys
to namespace strictly 1-1, we can simplify the URLs for API calls (some
users have already picked up on this). I'm added a comment to an
outstanding issue about this potential improvement we can make [1] where
initially
> you mean the property really indicates the Content-Type to represent the
resource as ? Have you considered using the an extension in the action such
as …/my-action.html ?
I had not. Do you mean an extension to describe both the content type and
the field to project? There are two parts to this
here's a screenshot if it's helpful - turns out I've missed at least 4
emails to dev list so far.
-r
[image: Inline image 1]
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I inadvertently found out I missed two replies to the dev list from Dragos
> and
I inadvertently found out I missed two replies to the dev list from Dragos
and Michael when Matt responded to the same thread. I checked my spam
folder and gmail claims the two messages were marked as spam because: "It
has a from address in adobe.com but has failed adobe.com's required tests
for
The following is a list of features that were planned for removal from
openwhisk before incubation. I'm positing there as a heads up in case new
discussion is warranted now.
1. removing node 0.12 support (
https://github.com/openwhisk/openwhisk/issues/1243)
2. removing swit 2 support (
Carlos are these two aliases: @openwhisk.apache.org and @
openwhisk.incubator.apache.org? So one can send email to either?
-r
I added a comment to your gist (https://gist.github.com/ddragosd/
3afd5d8678e5dbda48b943a1125aad0c#file-zcloudfront-conf-L71-L93) that
reflects my comments about boxing the event.
601 - 610 of 610 matches
Mail list logo