llis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States
-"Vincent S Hou" wrote: -
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
From: "Vincent S Hou"
Date: 06/29/2018 03:11PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk
module
Correction:
We removed the gradle wrapper
-7182
Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States
-Luciano Resende wrote: -
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
From: Luciano Resende
Date: 06/29/2018 08:36AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk
module
We are
/2018 08:36AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk
module
We are recommending not to use MD5 anymore, so before going to IPMC please
delete that.
The source tar file extracts to incubator-openwhisk without the version
info, which might be overwritten by next
] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk
module
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:29 AM Vincent S Hou wrote:
> This is the key, which is used by the Travis job. The private key is
> encrypted in the repo of incubator-openwhisk-release.
>
> For further releases, what email and u
From: Luciano Resende
Date: 06/29/2018 08:36AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk
module
We are recommending not to use MD5 anymore, so before going to IPMC please
delete that.
The source tar file extracts to incubator-openwhisk without the version
info
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:29 AM Vincent S Hou wrote:
> This is the key, which is used by the Travis job. The private key is
> encrypted in the repo of incubator-openwhisk-release.
>
> For further releases, what email and use id can we use? Do we have them
> handy somewhere? @Bertrand, do you have
s...@us.ibm.com,
> Phone: +1(919)254-7182
> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States
>
> -Rodric Rabbah wrote: -
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> From: Rodric Rabbah
> Date: 06/29/2018 08:04AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release A
: Rodric Rabbah
Date: 06/29/2018 08:04AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk
module
As Bertrand wrote:
gpg: Signature made Mon Jun 25 23:11:21 2018 CEST using RSA key ID 22CC20CC
> gpg: Good signature from "OpenWhisk Release Bot (Release of O
We are recommending not to use MD5 anymore, so before going to IPMC please
delete that.
The source tar file extracts to incubator-openwhisk without the version
info, which might be overwritten by next release.
Most of the ansible files do not have the full Apache License header, but
something lik
As Bertrand wrote:
gpg: Signature made Mon Jun 25 23:11:21 2018 CEST using RSA key ID 22CC20CC
> gpg: Good signature from "OpenWhisk Release Bot (Release of OpenWhisk)
> " [unknown]
>
The key does not appear to be verified. Further can we not use an @
apache.org email address vs this gmail id (wh
+1 on the release.
Done validation on Mac
[X] Download links are valid.
[0] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. (did not verify on this point
iteration)
[X] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[X ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo
+1 on the release.
I verified that sources built on MacOS and checked the following items:
[ X ] Download links are valid.
[ X ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[ X ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
release.
[ X ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each
] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
Best regards
Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
-"Vincent S Hou" wrote: -
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
From: "Vincent S Hou"
Date: 06/26/2018 05:27AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module
+1 on this release.
Checklist for reference:
[X] Download links are valid.
[0] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. (did not verify on this point
iteration)
[X] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[X ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk re
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:22 AM Markus Thoemmes
wrote:
...
> - [✓] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. (Other than gradlew.jar)
> Is there a procedure to verify the last point? I quickly did a find for jar
> files and a find for executable files...
I also use find + file to
Hey,
+1 on releasing this!
Checklist for reference:
- [✓] Download links are valid.
- [✓] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
- [✓] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
- [✓] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
- [✓] All files have l
Hey~ Since I am on the biz trip, I am a bit late.
Definitely +1 on this.
Great work~! Vincent.
I tried all things based on the guide and found all things correct except
one small thing.
Regarding the following part in the guide, I think those commands should
run under "incubator-openwhisk/ansibl
+1
> [✓] +1 Release as Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating
[ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release and the reason
>
> Checklist for reference:
> [✓] Download links are valid.
> [✓] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
*I wasn’t able to get the mit pgpkeys server to respond to a request for
t
I vote +1
Checklist for reference:
- [X] Download links are valid.
- [X] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
- [X] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
release.
- [X] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
- [X] All files have license headers if
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
[X] +1 Release as Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release and the reason
Checklist for reference:
[X] Download links are valid.
[0] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. (did not verify on this point
iteration)
[X] S
I vote +1
Checklist:
- [x] Download links are valid.
- [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
- [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
- [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
- [x] All files have license headers if necessary.
$ p
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:27 PM Vincent S Hou wrote:
> ...This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk
> 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module
+1 for the release of openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz
with SHA512()=
26d19d92ef4b4cf14f42fc0d425faaeb914690fcafb3dce
Hi everyone,
This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk
0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module.
List of JIRA ticket(s) resolved for this release can be found at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-213.
To learn more about Apache OpenWhisk, please visit
https:/
23 matches
Mail list logo
