2019-02-18 05:24:10 UTC - Thomas Peikert: is 512MB still action memory limit? on IBM at least I can select memory settings of up to 2048MB. But the docs still say 512MB for OpenWhisk <https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/blob/master/docs/reference.md> https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1550467450117100 ---- 2019-02-18 07:05:25 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: openwhisk operators can configure these limits at deployment time. https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1550473525117900?thread_ts=1550473525.117900&cid=C3TPCAQG1 ---- 2019-02-18 07:06:42 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: it might be worth clarifying that in the doc https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1550473602118500 ---- 2019-02-18 07:38:07 UTC - Satwik Kolhe: @Rodric Rabbah Is there a way to make these changes at run-time? Something like changing the values and restarting the invoker? https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1550475487118600?thread_ts=1550473525.117900&cid=C3TPCAQG1 ---- 2019-02-18 08:01:06 UTC - Rob Allen: @Thomas Peikert It's 2GB. <https://www.ibm.com/blogs/bluemix/2019/01/ibm-cloud-functions-raises-operations-limits/> https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1550476866119200 ---- 2019-02-18 11:11:17 UTC - Lars Andersson: I submitted a PR this morning, but Travis is failing several tests in `org.apache.openwhisk.core.containerpool.test.ContainerProxyTests`, which seems very unrelated to the changes I made in the Swagger spec. Any ideas what's causing this? (The PR is #4294). https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1550488277123800 ---- 2019-02-18 11:13:04 UTC - Lars Andersson: Another PR (#4295) I submitted after that one passed all tests. Just a glitch for #4294? https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1550488384124600 ---- 2019-02-18 12:36:54 UTC - Markus Thömmes: @Lars Andersson I think this is a known test flake. You can ignore that for your PR most likely https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1550493414125100 ---- 2019-02-18 13:17:44 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: that’s what I meant by deployment time. There has been discussion to add an admin api so things like this can be done dynamically without a restart. There’s an open pr too. https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1550495864127000?thread_ts=1550473525.117900&cid=C3TPCAQG1 ---- 2019-02-18 13:21:30 UTC - Satwik Kolhe: Great. Thanks for the update! :+1: https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1550496090127200?thread_ts=1550473525.117900&cid=C3TPCAQG1 ---- 2019-02-18 23:09:24 UTC - Carlos Santana: Anyone seen this problem on master openwhisk core repo? ``` > Task :common:scala:compileScala /Users/csantanapr/Documents/dev/whisk/git/apache/incubator-openwhisk/common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/ExecManifest.scala:79: Cannot find JsonReader or JsonFormat type class for .ExecManifest.RuntimeManifest]] .map(_.convertTo[Map[String, Set[RuntimeManifest]]].map { ^ /Users/csantana23/Documents/dev/whisk/git/apache/incubator-openwhisk/common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/ExecManifest.scala:81: type mismatch; found : Any required: String Note: implicit value runtimeManifestSerdes is not applicable here because it comes after the application point and it lacks an explicit result type RuntimeFamily(name, versions.map { mf => ^ ``` https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1550531364128400 ----
