2019-03-04 06:11:51 UTC - Sven Lange-Last: @Peter Leitner if you are talking about an action creating files in the action container’s file system: at the moment, apache openwhisk imposes no limits on the action container file system. that’s independent from the action’s physical ram limit @Carlos Santana was talking about. https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551679911058100?thread_ts=1551527847.054500&cid=C3TPCAQG1 ---- 2019-03-04 10:05:14 UTC - Erez Hadad: Hi folks. I submitted the performance evaluation tool that I presented in the last bi-weekly as PR #4320. I'd appreciate it if some folks can review it. +1 : Rodric Rabbah https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551693914060100 ---- 2019-03-04 16:11:59 UTC - Erez Hadad: It seems the default configuration of scancode in incubator-openwhisk-utilities is different from the one used by Travis. This is why my PR failed the first Travis check despite having me checked it previously with scancode. Is this worth notifying anyone? https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551715919061500 ---- 2019-03-04 16:18:48 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: @Matt Rutkowski might know best ^^ https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551716328062100 ---- 2019-03-04 16:25:33 UTC - Dave Grove: I think all of our projects use `--config scancode/ASF-Release.cfg` in their travis setup. Arguably that should be the default config for `scancode` https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551716733063000 ---- 2019-03-04 16:36:18 UTC - Dave Grove: @Matt Rutkowski I submitted <https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-utilities/pull/54> to change the default https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551717378063500 ---- 2019-03-04 16:38:04 UTC - Carlos Santana: @Dave Grove I think the one to use is V2, I think that's the one I use when I verify releases <https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-utilities/blob/master/scancode/ASF-Release-v2.cfg> https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551717484064200 ---- 2019-03-04 16:38:25 UTC - Carlos Santana: But I could be wrong :shrug: just let me know https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551717505064900 ---- 2019-03-04 16:39:07 UTC - Dave Grove: ok. I looked at main openwhisk travis scan. it is using ASF-Release.cfg. Let’s wait for Matt to weigh in. We should use the same config across all projects and it should be the default. https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551717547065700 ---- 2019-03-04 16:39:51 UTC - Carlos Santana: :100: same and all the repos https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551717591066100 ---- 2019-03-04 16:40:16 UTC - Carlos Santana: including incubator-openwhisk-release repo/docs https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551717616066800 ---- 2019-03-04 18:33:57 UTC - Matt Rutkowski: will look ASAP out of mtg hell https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551724437067100 ---- 2019-03-04 20:34:27 UTC - Matt Rutkowski: Yes, all “released” repos. use the ASF-Release.cfg (at least before any recent additional repos. were added in the last few months). I left “v2" out there for the remaining repos. that I did not have a chance to change their build/test scripts for so they would be break… indeed the file “ASF-Release.cfg should be the default. Thanks Dave https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551731667069100 ---- 2019-03-04 20:35:18 UTC - Matt Rutkowski: as all the repos. I changed explicitly passed the .cfg file as an arg. I did not catch the .py default.. this should have been done all along https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551731718069700 ---- 2019-03-04 20:36:06 UTC - Matt Rutkowski: If you like, we can delete v2 and accept “breaks” as people encounter them by building non-release repos.? https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551731766070300 ---- 2019-03-04 20:44:12 UTC - Dave Grove: Thanks Matt. I don’t know the context for ASF-Release.cfg vs. ASF-Release-v2.cfg. (is v2 stricter or more forgiving?) https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551732252072100 ---- 2019-03-04 20:45:38 UTC - Dave Grove: If we could manage to have just one, it would be simpler. https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1551732338072700 ----
