Hi.
For the clarity, that pr is basically started based on the idea that
currently the memory used by the prewarm pool is not being taken into
account while calculating the resource of invokers.
So we can't have a big enough prewarm pool as it will reduce the size of
"user memory". Otherwise, a big
Hi,
this does mean, that the prewarm pool's capacity cannot be reclaimed by
other actions should the need arise, right? I think that's problematic if
that notion isn't carried through into loadbalancing itself as AFAIK the
controller currently does not take the prewarm pool into account at all.
W
