ading that", "never saw that link", "i never explicitly agreed
to that" (i.e., is it legally binding)?
From: James Thomas
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Date: 07/16/2019 07:29 AM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Updating our contributions guide
On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 at 22:07
On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 at 22:07, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> I've looked around for some existing guidelines around CLA
> requirements, and so far I've found this:
>
> https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html#clas
>
> So basically, the general idea I've seen is that small, trivial
>
Thanks Matt. One of the improvements I thought I’d make is to explain exactly
this: when a cla is required and when we can accept improvements to
documentation, typos, minors fixes etc. without.
-r
> On Jul 13, 2019, at 5:07 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> I've looked around for some existing
I've looked around for some existing guidelines around CLA
requirements, and so far I've found this:
https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html#clas
This relates eventually to the provenance of source code hosted at the ASF:
It was pointed out that our contributing guide sets a higher bar than other
Apache projects by requiring an ICLA.
Looking at some of the other successful Apache projects they do a better job
explaining how to contribute, and all the ways someone can be contributor, and
how to open a PR,
