Hi,
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> ...We recently had a public (and private threads) around "models" for
> donation at Apache which went no where...
IIUC you mean donating resources for automated testing?
The ASF now has a Targeted Sponsors [1] program meant
LGTM - nice work Matt.
On the "Community" section? Would it be worth adding the growth of the
Slack community? We're ~800 members and it is really active.
On 5 June 2018 at 18:51, Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> Whiskers,
>
> I have drafted our project board report for this quarter (June); I plan to
>
Matt,
Thanks for spending time doing the report, I can't express more gratitude
about this.
On one of the board meetings, someone mentioned that "OpenWhisk" report is
one of the best incubator reports they have seen in years. Kudos !!
I don't know how you come up with so excellent detail report
This looks excellent - I've seen lots of people asking about Ruby support
before!
If you had time to write up generic instructions for creating a new
runtime, based on your experiences, it would help others add more. It has
been something we've been meaning to do since the PHP runtime.
Also, if
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Matt Rutkowski wrote:
...
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=85475755 ...
Thanks for this! Great report as usual.
Could "Increase additional company and individual Contributors to
maintain all project repos" be changed to just
Hi,
This email is follow-up from #3725 which proposes Ruby2.5 runtime addition.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/3725
> (perhaps including a small example on how to try it)
Here is a quick introduction on how to use and test this runtime. Excuse me
in advance for a little bit
Dear Tyson.
Sorry for the late response, I thought I am already supposed to share it at
this meeting.
I am in.
Let me continue to share my scheduling proposal.
Thanks
Regards
Dominic.
2018-06-06 17:41 GMT+09:00 Rodric Rabbah :
> Thanks Sandeep - id like to see; we need a plan for resolving
Someone wrote:
> ...Would it be worth adding the growth of the
> Slack community? We're ~800 members and it is really active
With my incubation mentor hat on: enthusiasm for the the project is
fantastic news, but Apache projects should do their business on
asynchronous channels, and I don't
Hi Tyson,
If time permits I can demo OpenWhisk tracing support based on my PR.
thanks,
Sandeep
On 2018/06/05 16:08:23, Tyson Norris wrote:
> Hi All -
> Reminder: the biweekly call is tomorrow 10 am GMT-5:00 (US Central Time),
> please send any agenda items to the list or myself.
> Google cal
Thanks Sandeep - id like to see; we need a plan for resolving the long
outstanding pr so getting to see the status, features, and your thoughts will
be essential.
Tyson, I hope we can put this toward the top of the agenda, along with the
release discussion.
-r
> On Jun 6, 2018, at 4:37 AM,
> > If you had time to write up generic instructions for creating a new
> > runtime, based on your experiences, it would help others add more. It has
> > been something we've been meaning to do since the PHP runtime.
> >
> > Also, if you get time, adding a simple OpenWhisk Ruby client library to
>
> On 6 Jun 2018, at 15:30, Rodric Rabbah wrote:
>
> Re slack... good discipline on our part does make it easier to catch up
> even after hundreds of messages are posted. We do try to organize
> discussions using slack threads so that it is easier to follow a particular
> topic. This doesn't
I think the company is referring to that to my understanding is that the
project to graduate should have at least 3 companies sponsoring the
project, which typically in practice sponsoring means that they are behind
the project in case 1 company drops, there are at least 2 to continue the
project.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:42 PM, David P Grove wrote:
> ...As Rodric said, properly organized channels and the use of threads help
> quite a bit...
Do you have a few Slack URLs of good examples of that?
I'll look at them quickly, before they disappear ;-)
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:05 PM, David P Grove wrote:
> ...Professionally, I'm on several Slack teams that are paid (unlimited
> history) and I personally find it _much_ easier to catch up with and
> understand multiple weeks of technical conversation in a properly focused
> Slack channel
Apologies for missing the interchange today; unavoidable personal conflict.
A quick update on the openwhisk-deploy-kube sub-project.
1. Main focus in the last two weeks has been the Helm-based
deployment. This is looking really solid. I'm working on a PR now to
reorganize the
Chetan suggested looking into Slack workspace export - It looks like we can
export all the messages this way (since 1/20/2017 for public channels). A
simple UI to polish the JSON and make it easier to read and search would be
helpful.
Here's an example of a recent thread of discussion:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Carlos Santana wrote:
> ...I think the company is referring to that to my understanding is that the
> project to graduate should have at least 3 companies sponsoring the
> project...
It's not exactly that. To graduate, a project must have "sufficient
diversity" so
Re slack... good discipline on our part does make it easier to catch up
even after hundreds of messages are posted. We do try to organize
discussions using slack threads so that it is easier to follow a particular
topic. This doesn't always happen and as I noted, requires good habits.
We have
Sorry for the late response Tyson.
Let me first answer your second question.
Vuser is just the number of threads to send the requests.
Each Vusers randomly picked the namespace and send the request using REST
API.
So they are independent of the number of namespaces.
And regarding performance
Sorry.
Let me share Kafka benchmark results again.
| # of topics | Kafka TPS |
|50 | 34,488 |
| 100 | 34,502 |
| 200 | 31,781 |
| 500 | 30,324 |
| 1000 | 30,855 |
Best regards
Dominic
2018-06-07 2:04 GMT+09:00 Dominic Kim :
> Sorry for the late response Tyson.
>
> Let
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote on 06/06/2018 11:06:01
AM:
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:42 PM, David P Grove wrote:
> > ...As Rodric said, properly organized channels and the use of threads
help
> > quite a bit...
>
> Do you have a few Slack URLs of good examples of that?
>
> I'll look at them
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote on 06/06/2018 09:32:09
AM:
> > ...Would it be worth adding the growth of the
> > Slack community? We're ~800 members and it is really active
>
> With my incubation mentor hat on: enthusiasm for the the project is
> fantastic news, but Apache projects should do
23 matches
Mail list logo
