Hi Dominic.
I have read the POEM and provided some suggestions and posed some questions
in the PR.
In general, I support this direction. In fact, I think it will work well
with the POEM I have been (slowly) working on and want to submit for
containerless functions in support of edge use cases and using isolates.
This is a substantial innovation to the project - thank you and @ningyougang,
@keonhee, @jiangpengcheng, @upgle for contributing this work to the project.
-r
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:42 PM Dominic Kim wrote:
> Dear whiskers.
>
> I want to see if there is anyone with comments.
> As per our guideline[1], I am supposed to proceed with a vote to let my PR
> be included and start development.
>
> Before opening a vote, please share your opinion.
> As discussed, we would incrementally merge small pieces of PRs while
> allowing some transient incomplete codes such as some modules without
> counterparts, some modules with dummy codes.
> Even if this kind of code would be complete as more PRs are merged, I hope
> we can form a consensus about this in advance.
>
>
>
> Thank you
> Best regards
> Dominic
>
> * [1] POEM guideline:
>
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/proposals/POEM-1-proposal-for-openwhisk-enhancements.md#procedures
>
