Re: Signalling production-state of an action

Hi, In general, I'm in favour of the idea of setting properties rather than any sort of convention as it's far more flexible. Regards, Rob... > On 2 Sep 2017, at 19:19, Michael Marth wrote: > > Hi Carlos, > > Thanks for the feedback. > “_” as a separator was just

Re: Signalling production-state of an action

Hi Carlos, Thanks for the feedback. “_” as a separator was just an example, could be anything else as well. But IIUC your comment “Like a boolean that the user wants a certain namespace to be treated as "test/debug"” you hint at an idea I like better: letting users apply properties to

Signalling production-state of an action

Hi, in yesterday’s tech exchange Rodric mentioned that OW does not „know“ if an action is in production or still in development stage. The context of that comment was that we could consider to treat the activation log collection separately (depending on the in-production-state). In our OW