Re: Use an explicit property to define type of Whisk entity

2017-12-07 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
Thanks Rodric for the background details. Continuing the discussion from Slack > You'll have to augment the serialize entity type to add this property (but > I would not add it to the actual types since it's redundant). Ack. So would add the types implicitly in serialization logic > The same

Re: Use an explicit property to define type of Whisk entity

2017-12-07 Thread Rodric Rabbah
Adding an entity type can work - it would simplify the views. It's mostly a historical footnote why it doesn't exist and why it's inferred. You'll have to augment the serialize entity type to add this property (but I would not add it to the actual types since it's redundant). This could benefit

Re: Use an explicit property to define type of Whisk entity

2017-12-07 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
Would be helpful if some feedback can be provided here. If this looks ok I can work on PR around this topic Chetan Mehrotra On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Chetan Mehrotra wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Currently all whisk entities are stored in "whisks" collection in >