With three +1's the vote passes. Thank you, Dongjoon and Alan for voting.
.. Owen
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 9:30 PM Alan Gates wrote:
> +1. Checked the signature and hash, did a build with the ubuntu 18 docker
> file, and checked for any binary files or license violations.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Fri,
+1. Checked the signature and hash, did a build with the ubuntu 18 docker
file, and checked for any binary files or license violations.
Alan.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 1:18 PM Dongjoon Hyun
wrote:
> +1
>
> 1. Checked the checksum and signature.
> 2. Tested building and running Java unit tests wi
+1
1. Checked the checksum and signature.
2. Tested building and running Java unit tests with JDK8 and JDK11 on Mac.
3. Tested with Apache Spark
Thank you, Owen.
Bests,
Dongjoon
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:15 PM Owen O'Malley
wrote:
> All,
>
> Should we release the following artifacts as ORC 1
Thank you!
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 21:22 Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Ok, I had created a new subkey and hadn't pushed it to the servers or the
> KEYS file. If you import the ORC KEYS file now, it should check out. The
> new subkey (75EBAAECF7A297FF22E8C18DD19EB09DAD1C5877) still uses the same
> maste
Ok, I had created a new subkey and hadn't pushed it to the servers or the
KEYS file. If you import the ORC KEYS file now, it should check out. The
new subkey (75EBAAECF7A297FF22E8C18DD19EB09DAD1C5877) still uses the same
master key (47660BC98BC433F01E5C90581209E7F13D0C92B9).
Thanks,
Owen
On Th
Hi, Owen.
Could you check the GPG sign? I'm hitting GPG verification failure like the
following.
# gpg --verify orc-1.5.10rc1.tar.gz.asc
gpg: assuming signed data in 'orc-1.5.10rc1.tar.gz'
gpg: Signature made Thu Apr 23 17:12:16 2020 PDT
gpg:using RSA key 75EBAAECF7A297FF22E8C18DD
All,
Should we release the following artifacts as ORC 1.5.10?
tar: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/orc-1.5.10/
tag: https://github.com/apache/orc/releases/tag/release-1.5.10rc1
jiras: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ORC/versions/12346912
Thanks!
