[jira] [Assigned] (PARQUET-1519) [C++] Remove use of "extern template class" from parquet/column_reader.h

2019-01-29 Thread Wes McKinney (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wes McKinney reassigned PARQUET-1519: - Assignee: Wes McKinney > [C++] Remove use of "extern template class" from

[jira] [Updated] (PARQUET-1519) [C++] Remove use of "extern template class" from parquet/column_reader.h

2019-01-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ASF GitHub Bot updated PARQUET-1519: Labels: pull-request-available (was: ) > [C++] Remove use of "extern template class"

[jira] [Created] (PARQUET-1519) [C++] Remove use of "extern template class" from parquet/column_reader.h

2019-01-29 Thread Wes McKinney (JIRA)
Wes McKinney created PARQUET-1519: - Summary: [C++] Remove use of "extern template class" from parquet/column_reader.h Key: PARQUET-1519 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1519

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove old modules?

2019-01-29 Thread Ryan Blue
I don't think we need a major release to drop modules. Those modules will just not be released. That fits with semantic versioning because the line of versions stops. On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:37 AM Gabor Szadovszky wrote: > Hi, > > I agree with Fokko. It would be nice to drop these modules but

[jira] [Resolved] (PARQUET-1508) [C++] Enable reading from ByteArray and FixedLenByteArray decoders directly into arrow::BinaryBuilder or arrow::BinaryDictionaryBuilder

2019-01-29 Thread Wes McKinney (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wes McKinney resolved PARQUET-1508. --- Resolution: Fixed Issue resolved by pull request 3492

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet 1.10.1 RC0

2019-01-29 Thread Nandor Kollar
+1 (non-binding) Verified signature and checksum, ran unit tests, all passed. Cheers, Nandor On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 1:21 PM Gabor Szadovszky wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > Checked the tarball: checksum/signature are correct. Content is correct > based on the release tag. Unit tests pass. > > +1

[jira] [Commented] (PARQUET-1518) Bump Jackson2 version of parquet-cli

2019-01-29 Thread Gabor Szadovszky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16755006#comment-16755006 ] Gabor Szadovszky commented on PARQUET-1518: --- parquet-mr currently uses two different jackson

[jira] [Updated] (PARQUET-1518) Bump Jackson2 version of parquet-cli

2019-01-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ASF GitHub Bot updated PARQUET-1518: Labels: pull-request-available (was: ) > Bump Jackson2 version of parquet-cli >

[jira] [Commented] (PARQUET-1518) Bump Jackson2 version of parquet-cli

2019-01-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16754996#comment-16754996 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PARQUET-1518: - Fokko commented on pull request #609: [PARQUET-1518]

Re: [DISCUSS] Bump Apache Thrift dependency to 0.12.0

2019-01-29 Thread Driesprong, Fokko
Thanks all for the responses. Ryan, you are correct, as we should only have a binary dependency. Right now we're compiling the source of Thrift in the CI. Of course, I can add some automated tests to read/write different versions of Thrift. Afaik it should be binary compatible, both forward as

[jira] [Resolved] (PARQUET-1375) upgrade to supported version of Jackson

2019-01-29 Thread Fokko Driesprong (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fokko Driesprong resolved PARQUET-1375. --- Resolution: Invalid Assignee: Fokko Driesprong Jackson is now 2.x > upgrade

[jira] [Reopened] (PARQUET-1375) upgrade to supported version of Jackson

2019-01-29 Thread Fokko Driesprong (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fokko Driesprong reopened PARQUET-1375: --- > upgrade to supported version of Jackson > --- >

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (PARQUET-1375) upgrade to supported version of Jackson

2019-01-29 Thread Fokko Driesprong (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fokko Driesprong updated PARQUET-1375: -- Comment: was deleted (was: Jackson is now 2.x) > upgrade to supported version of

[jira] [Created] (PARQUET-1518) Bump Jackson2 version of parquet-cli

2019-01-29 Thread Fokko Driesprong (JIRA)
Fokko Driesprong created PARQUET-1518: - Summary: Bump Jackson2 version of parquet-cli Key: PARQUET-1518 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1518 Project: Parquet Issue

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet 1.10.1 RC0

2019-01-29 Thread Gabor Szadovszky
Hi Ryan, Checked the tarball: checksum/signature are correct. Content is correct based on the release tag. Unit tests pass. +1 (non-binding) Cheers, Gabor On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:08 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove old modules?

2019-01-29 Thread Gabor Szadovszky
Hi, I agree with Fokko. It would be nice to drop these modules but only in the next major release. On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:57 AM Uwe L. Korn wrote: > Hello Fokko, > > I have put up a PR for the Scala update > https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/605. parquet-scrooge fails due > to a

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove old modules?

2019-01-29 Thread Uwe L. Korn
Hello Fokko, I have put up a PR for the Scala update https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/605. parquet-scrooge fails due to a Thrift parsing error but parquet-scala succeeds with Scala 2.12 With dropping scrooge, we could at least move this forward. Uwe > Am 29.01.2019 um 11:40 schrieb

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove old modules?

2019-01-29 Thread Nandor Kollar
Removing parquet-hive-* is a great idea, the code in Parquet is not maintained any more, it is just a burden there. As of parquet-pig, I'd prefer moving it to Pig (if Pig community accepts it as it is) instead of dropping it or moving to a separate project. I know people who still use Pig with

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove old modules?

2019-01-29 Thread Driesprong, Fokko
Hi Ryan, I think that would be a great idea. Having these old modules around if we don't use them, doesn't make any sense. - For the parquet-scala module, I might take the time to bump this to Scala 2.12 if people are still interested in this. - Personally, I'm using parquet-tools, mostly

[jira] [Updated] (PARQUET-1517) [C++] Update cpp crypto package to match signed-off specification

2019-01-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ASF GitHub Bot updated PARQUET-1517: Labels: pull-request-available (was: ) > [C++] Update cpp crypto package to match

[jira] [Created] (PARQUET-1517) [C++] Update cpp crypto package to match signed-off specification

2019-01-29 Thread Gidon Gershinsky (JIRA)
Gidon Gershinsky created PARQUET-1517: - Summary: [C++] Update cpp crypto package to match signed-off specification Key: PARQUET-1517 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1517