+1
Best,
Xuwei Fu
Gang Wu 于2024年1月9日周二 10:58写道：
> +1
>
> > What should be the way forward? Should I submit a format update
> and then one or two implementations thereof?
>
> Based on my observation of recent format changes, it usually follows
> the steps below:
> (1) A PR for a format change.
+1
> What should be the way forward? Should I submit a format update
and then one or two implementations thereof?
Based on my observation of recent format changes, it usually follows
the steps below:
(1) A PR for a format change.
(2) Two PRs of PoC implementation for feature and
+1 that this is beneficial, especially for 16 bit floats
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 11:56 Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Based on the response received, it seems this addition is
> non-controversial and generally considered beneficial.
>
> What should be the way forward? Should I submit a
Hello all,
Based on the response received, it seems this addition is
non-controversial and generally considered beneficial.
What should be the way forward? Should I submit a format update
and then one or two implementations thereof?
Regards
Antoine.
On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 23:40:11 -0800
Micah
I responded there but generally, this doesn't seem like it imposes a lot of
implementation burden and can be useful.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:59 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Just a heads up here so as to reach a wider audience: I've posted a
> format addition proposal in
>
Hello,
Just a heads up here so as to reach a wider audience: I've posted a
format addition proposal in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2414
Excerpt:
"""
This issue proposed to widen the types supported by the
BYTE_STREAM_SPLIT. By allowing the BYTE_STREAM_SPLIT on any
