Hi,
The release candidate has received the following votes:
+1 by 4 community members (1 binding, 3 non-binding)
+0 by 1 community member
no -1 votes
Since several bug fixes have been added to the code base since the RC, it
does not make sense to keep this vote open. We will create a new
Hi all,
Is there an ETA for release?
Kind regards,
Volodymyr Vysotskyi
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:50 AM Uwe L. Korn wrote:
> Hello Gabor,
>
> you probably confused Wes and me ;) I'm going to give this a try on Linux
> and try to verify the release. The Java 9+ issues sadly makes it harder
Hello Gabor,
you probably confused Wes and me ;) I'm going to give this a try on Linux and
try to verify the release. The Java 9+ issues sadly makes it harder for me to
verify it on my normal system.
Uwe
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019, at 9:44 AM, Gabor Szadovszky wrote:
> Hi Wes,
>
> Thanks for
Sorry, Uwe. I wanted to repy to you. :)
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:44 AM Gabor Szadovszky wrote:
> Hi Wes,
>
> Thanks for checking the RC and voting.
> I would like to highlight that the mentioned issues are also reproducible
> on Linux with the parquet release 1.10.0 so these are not
Hi Wes,
Thanks for checking the RC and voting.
I would like to highlight that the mentioned issues are also reproducible
on Linux with the parquet release 1.10.0 so these are not regressions. We
currently support java8 only so I cannot see any issue with the release.
I completely agree that these
Hi,
I'm sadly giving a +0 here. The signatures look good but I was unable to build
with JDK 9/10/11 on OSX. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1497 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1496 are the problems I'm running
into. I've also opened a PR to document how to
Hi All,
While not a binding one, it's a "+1 (non-binding), everything looks good"
from me!
Best,
Anna
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:13 PM Zoltan Ivanfi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Friendly reminder to please vote for the release. We need 2 more binding +1
> votes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Zoltan
>
> On Sat, Jan 12,
Hi,
Friendly reminder to please vote for the release. We need 2 more binding +1
votes.
Thanks,
Zoltan
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 3:07 AM 俊杰陈 wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> * contents looks good
> * unit tests passed
>
>
> Zoltan Ivanfi 于2019年1月11日周五 下午9:31写道：
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > *
+1 (non-binding)
* contents looks good
* unit tests passed
Zoltan Ivanfi 于2019年1月11日周五 下午9:31写道：
> +1 (binding)
>
> * contents look good
> * unit tests pass
> * checksums match
> * signature matches
>
> Br,
>
> Zoltan
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:48 AM Gabor Szadovszky
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
+1 (binding)
* contents look good
* unit tests pass
* checksums match
* signature matches
Br,
Zoltan
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:48 AM Gabor Szadovszky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Checked tarball: checksum/signature are correct. Content is correct based
> on release tag. Unit tests pass.
>
> +1
Hi,
Checked tarball: checksum/signature are correct. Content is correct based
on release tag. Unit tests pass.
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Gabor
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 4:51 PM Zoltan Ivanfi
wrote:
> Dear Parquet Users and Developers,
>
> I propose the following RC to be released as the official
Dear Parquet Users and Developers,
I propose the following RC to be released as the official Apache
Parquet 1.11.0 release:
The commit id is 8be767d12cca295cf9858a521725fc440b0c6f93
* This corresponds to the tag: apache-parquet-1.11.0
*
12 matches
Mail list logo
