[jira] [Commented] (PARQUET-1065) Deprecate type-defined sort ordering for INT96 type

2018-01-09 Thread Zoltan Ivanfi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16318547#comment-16318547 ] Zoltan Ivanfi commented on PARQUET-1065: [~lv], we can not change the ordering for the existing

[jira] [Commented] (PARQUET-1065) Deprecate type-defined sort ordering for INT96 type

2018-01-09 Thread Lars Volker (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16318529#comment-16318529 ] Lars Volker commented on PARQUET-1065: -- Thank you [~zi] for the explanation and the example. I got

[jira] [Commented] (PARQUET-1065) Deprecate type-defined sort ordering for INT96 type

2018-01-09 Thread Zoltan Ivanfi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16318446#comment-16318446 ] Zoltan Ivanfi commented on PARQUET-1065: I think it is worth going through an example, the

[jira] [Commented] (PARQUET-1065) Deprecate type-defined sort ordering for INT96 type

2018-01-09 Thread Zoltan Ivanfi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16318436#comment-16318436 ] Zoltan Ivanfi commented on PARQUET-1065: The Parquet specification does not talk about

[jira] [Commented] (PARQUET-1065) Deprecate type-defined sort ordering for INT96 type

2018-01-09 Thread Lars Volker (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16318280#comment-16318280 ] Lars Volker commented on PARQUET-1065: -- My understanding is that primitive types (INT32, INT64) use

[jira] [Commented] (PARQUET-1065) Deprecate type-defined sort ordering for INT96 type

2017-10-17 Thread Zoltan Ivanfi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16207226#comment-16207226 ] Zoltan Ivanfi commented on PARQUET-1065: The bytes of a timestamp are stored in the opposite

[jira] [Commented] (PARQUET-1065) Deprecate type-defined sort ordering for INT96 type

2017-10-16 Thread Deepak Majeti (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16206424#comment-16206424 ] Deepak Majeti commented on PARQUET-1065: If we treat Int96 as a primitive data type, then we

[jira] [Commented] (PARQUET-1065) Deprecate type-defined sort ordering for INT96 type

2017-10-16 Thread Zoltan Ivanfi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16205986#comment-16205986 ] Zoltan Ivanfi commented on PARQUET-1065: Unfortunately, since INT96 timestamps are stored in

[jira] [Commented] (PARQUET-1065) Deprecate type-defined sort ordering for INT96 type

2017-10-12 Thread Deepak Majeti (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16202552#comment-16202552 ] Deepak Majeti commented on PARQUET-1065: INT96 timestamps can be sorted using both signed and